I would prefer to minimize the amount of JS that ships with the scafolding app. It makes it easier to customize it. I do not object to making admin more sophisticate and flashier.
Massimo On Jun 9, 7:28 am, "mr.freeze" <nfre...@gmail.com> wrote: > Ooooh...That's nice too. Massimo, should one of these (probably a > jQuery based one) replace the default response.flash behavior to give > web2py some more pizazz out of the box? Also, what are your thoughts > on including jQueryUI with web2py and replacing the current default > clunky calendar with the jQueryUI calendar? > > On Jun 9, 5:19 am, Trollkarlen <robbelibob...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I have done the same but with:http://digitarald.de/project/roar > > > They have very nice things on that site. > > > /T > > > mr.freeze wrote: > > > I don't like having to click on response.flash to close it so I > > > replaced it with this: > > >http://stanlemon.net/projects/jgrowl.html > > > Just thought I would share. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py Web Framework" group. To post to this group, send email to web2py@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
