Interesting. I fully understand and like the backward-compatible policy of web2py. But in this case, in this moment, I assume there aren't many people download 1.64.2 yet, and only Mr. Freeze is using the IS_COMPLEX. So, it is not too late now to change it to a more proper name. Otherwise, I think the ambiguous even misleading name could be an issue in long term.
Just my $0.02 On Jun18, 1:37pm, mdipierro <mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu> wrote: > Good point but now it made it into stable. I doubt this will be an > issue. > > On Jun 18, 12:15 am, Markus Gritsch <m.grit...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Well, IS_COMPLEX is not a good name since Python has a complex > > datatype: e.g. 3+5j and one could assume it is tested for this. > > > Markus --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py Web Framework" group. To post to this group, send email to web2py@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
