I vote for: A: The plug-in mechanism/specification. This is the only core feature missing, which Drupal, RoR and others have. B: Improved visuals and default templates (checkout the latest Django UI elements for the default admin panel; http://gosatchmo.com/static/images/gosatchmo/django-admin-plugins-screenshot1.gif and http://graffletopia.com/images/previews/362/original.jpg).
@Alex: IdeaTorrent looks great for managing this kind of discussion (but I see it's based on Drupal). Maybe someone can tune Reddish to have the features we need to manage the roadmap? @Timmie: I think the distinction lyx (and most opensource projects) make between 'development', 'stable', and 'previous' versions is exactly what web2py needs. Thanks! On Jul 15, 10:49 am, Timmie <timmichel...@gmx-topmail.de> wrote: > Dear Lucas & Massimo! > > a very good discussion I have waited for quite some time. > > As others have highlighted before: > * a clear roadmap and goal is crucial for preparing and supporting > decision makers > * a quick overview on a project structure is essential to prospectuve > new users and possible contributors (see for instance:http://www.lyx.org/) > > Note that the coders themselves may hang out here and follow this > list. > But one cannot send dozens of thread links to a CTO to say: "Look on > this page. Web2py folks are planning to go into this direction. That > refelcts our philisophy and meets our requirements." > > Please fix this information somewhere prominent on web2py.com! > > Thanks, > Timmie --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py Web Framework" group. To post to this group, send email to web2py@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
