One other point. Web2Py is lightweight enough using sqlite that it fits quite well in areas where --
* portability is required. * space is at a premium. * The ability to have multitude of support applications are not possible (eg java creep, jre) Just a thought. On Jul 17, 6:34 am, JohnMc <maruadventu...@gmail.com> wrote: > The problem with Web2Py is that it does not have a niche. Right now, > Django is occupying the same niche. As the first-comer, it has the > advantage that people already know how to use it. Until Web2Py manages > to have a benefit greater than its own learning curve, Web2Py will > continue to sit in second place. > > I hereby invoke the Jack Welch rule - Be first or second in any > endeavor, otherwise get out. > > Were Web2Py to be number two behind Django after a concerted effort, > that quite frankly would be an outcome worth crowing about. Being > number two in the software game is not a bad place to be. > > I have said in a previous post that Web2Py support of a schemeless DB > would put it in a position to have a niche. The 'cloud' might have a > lot of action but there is still going to be whole swaths of the > economy where the cloud will not be feasible (eg. NYSE). Which DB I > leave up to those more insightful than myself. > > JohnMc > > On Jul 17, 2:34 am, Bottiger <bottig...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Finally, this community has to do a better job at outreach. You should > > > talk to your friends and blog about web2py. You must talk about the > > applications you build with it. We do not lack developers. We lack > > salesmen. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py Web Framework" group. To post to this group, send email to web2py@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
