I like A. Lots of respect to both designers for the time they put in.
On Aug 14, 12:00 pm, Yarko Tymciurak <yark...@gmail.com> wrote: > or put another way - this can still be updated: > > since there was a majority of preference for the font of the "squared" > configuration, > would you ask the author of the wonderful icon to match? or (as I did) have > the author > of the latter do an overlay of the horizontal logo with the same font used > in the squared version? > > Thanks, > Yarko > > On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Yarko Tymciurak <yark...@gmail.com> wrote: > > my point is still: why did you not request consitency in the fonts of the > > two configurations? > > > On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 1:45 PM, mdipierro <mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu>wrote: > > >> I did not choose. I just posted some options for people here to > >> choose. > > >> Massimo > > >> On Aug 14, 1:41 pm, Yarko Tymciurak <yark...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 1:34 PM, mdipierro <mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu> > >> wrote: > > >> > > Yes those are definitively 3 people forming a W and that is what makes > >> > > it great.I do not think t looks like a bug at all. > > >> > I agree - the more I see this over the months, the more appealing it > >> is... > > >> > One quetion, though - if you opted for 2 configurations of the logo (and > >> it > >> > makes sense to have > >> > a horizontal and a "squared" version) --- why did you not keep them > >> > consistent? e.g. same font? > > >> > I think this is important for consistency. > > >> > > On Aug 14, 1:12 pm, __future__ <wrigh...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > > > That is what I thought you were referring to. Do you think it looks > >> > > > like a bug? I thought it looked like 3 people. I guess it could > >> be > >> > > > bug... I think our Rorschach results would be quite different :) > > >> > > > On Aug 14, 11:33 am, Jonathan Lundell <jlund...@pobox.com> wrote: > > >> > > > > On Aug 14, 2009, at 9:15 AM, __future__ wrote: > > >> > > > > > I don't think that is a bug but I could be wrong. > > >> > > > > By 'bug' I mean (in this example) the stylized W, minus the > >> 'web2py' > >> > > > > text. > > >> > > > > > I wouldn't mind a lighter font but I still think A is the best > >> of the > >> > > > > > 2. The font in Massimo's "compromise" is a better than the look > >> of > >> > > the > >> > > > > > original B font which is just too plain, IMO. > > >> > > > > > Overall, I don't like the "compromise" version. Too big, too > >> busy... > >> > > > > > too unbalanced. > > >> > > > > > Logo's should be simple and easily recognizable. > > >> > > > > > I also think A does reference the Python Logo a bit, at least in > >> > > terms > >> > > > > > of style. Using a similar font to the Python logo would make it > >> do > >> > > > > > that even more so. > > >> > > > > > On Aug 14, 10:43 am, Jonathan Lundell <jlund...@pobox.com> > >> wrote: > >> > > > > >> On Aug 14, 2009, at 5:40 AM, Massimo Di Pierro wrote: > > >> > > > > >>> What about this compromise (assuming the two authors agree)? > > >> > > > > >> It's pretty busy, and misses the elegant simplicity of A. (Do > >> you > >> > > > > >> really need the URL in the logo? The TM?) > > >> > > > > >> If you really need to put the A logo in a square space, try > >> just > >> > > > > >> moving 'web2py' below the W bug and shrinking it. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To post to this group, send email to web2py@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
