[web2py] Re: DAL list:integer and postgresql integer array type

2012-06-01 Thread Massimo Di Pierro
The search by content should be faster using native postgresql array type. Everything else should be the same. We could change it and should be easy. The problem is backward compatibility. I need to give some thought about this. Please open a ticket to google code. On Friday, 1 June 2012 16:49:

[web2py] Re: DAL list:integer and postgresql integer array type

2012-06-04 Thread Lewis
Done. Thanks.

Re: [web2py] Re: DAL list:integer and postgresql integer array type

2012-06-04 Thread Bruno Rocha
Cant we have a custom field for this? Field.PostgresIntegerList("name") http://zerp.ly/rochacbruno Em 02/06/2012 00:26, "Massimo Di Pierro" escreveu: > The search by content should be faster using native postgresql array type. > Everything else should be the same. We could change it and should

Re: [web2py] Re: DAL list:integer and postgresql integer array type

2012-06-05 Thread Michele Comitini
Wouldn't that make it non portable to other db's? mic 2012/6/5 Bruno Rocha : > Cant we have a custom field for this? > > Field.PostgresIntegerList("name") > > http://zerp.ly/rochacbruno > > Em 02/06/2012 00:26, "Massimo Di Pierro" > escreveu: > >> The search by content should be faster using na

Re: [web2py] Re: DAL list:integer and postgresql integer array type

2012-06-05 Thread Massimo Di Pierro
I think list:integer should take advantage of postgres list feature if available. The issue is how to make it backward compatible to current implementation. On Tuesday, 5 June 2012 15:33:37 UTC-5, mcm wrote: > > Wouldn't that make it non portable to other db's? > > mic > > > 2012/6/5 Bruno