my only concern would be timeouts for large tables
On Nov 4, 11:39 am, howesc <how...@umich.edu> wrote: > Massimo and others, > > Google claims that count() does not have an enforced limit, though > they have mis-documented the feature. > seehttp://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=4001if you > are curious. in order to get count to be truly limitless, you need to > pass limit=None to count. Now, i like my count to really be my count > so i would like to change line 772 of gql.py from: > return items.count() > to: > return items.count(limit=None) > > I know that when my count is greater than the default limit of 1000 > that google says it might be slow, but i think an accurate count is > more correct than a fast one. > > thoughts? if you agree do you mind updating gql.py? > > thanks, > > christian
