Yes, if you use any validator IS_IN_SET or IS_IN_DB with
multiple=True
I think it is still very convenient and can simplify some of your
code. Yet on RDBS you can do joins and this should be used a
replacement for that.
On Aug 11, 9:51 pm, Jason Brower encomp...@gmail.com wrote:
Should i worry
ew
jaywalking should never be a replacement for joins...
--
Thadeus
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 2:42 AM, mdipierro mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu wrote:
Yes, if you use any validator IS_IN_SET or IS_IN_DB with
multiple=True
I think it is still very convenient and can simplify some of your
code.
True but joins are expensive.
If I only need many2many in one directions I use the list:reference
and I cache the query that maps the id into the representation of the
corresponding record.
Massimo
On Aug 12, 11:10 am, Thadeus Burgess thade...@thadeusb.com wrote:
ew
jaywalking should never
I do not recommend anyone to actually use this. This is just horrible.
If I only need many2many in one directions I use the list:reference
and I cache the query that maps the id into the representation of the
corresponding record.
Then why are you not using the database types that are
4 matches
Mail list logo
