On Aug 6, 2010, at 9:40 AM, Phyo Arkar wrote:
i voted this too.
I just dont like the controller named default and i want it different
on each apps.
On 8/6/10, mr.freeze nat...@freezable.com wrote:
Massimo, why not make the default application,controller and function
configurable in an
Very nice. I think this is more congruous with web2py's philosophy of
ease of use.
On Aug 11, 11:12 am, Jonathan Lundell jlund...@pobox.com wrote:
On Aug 6, 2010, at 9:40 AM, Phyo Arkar wrote:
i voted this too.
I just dont like thecontrollernameddefaultand i want it different
on each
On Aug 11, 2010, at 6:43 PM, mr.freeze wrote:
Very nice. I think this is more congruous with web2py's philosophy of
ease of use.
It seems clean enough, I think.
One thing to keep in mind (I think I've mentioned this somewhere) is that the
default_application setting is effective only after
+1
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 12:00 AM, mr.freeze nat...@freezable.com wrote:
Not another config file, just another config option. Why have the
overhead and complexity of a routes regex when you could just set it
explicitly in an existing config file? Just seems more straightforward
and user
No. But you can remap into a different controller using routes.py
routes_in = [
('/myapp', '/myapp/non_default/index'),
]
On Aug 6, 9:05 am, David Marko dma...@tiscali.cz wrote:
Is there a way how to specifiy, which controller act as default? I
mean specify different controller than with name
Massimo, why not make the default application,controller and function
configurable in an external file like options.py or
parameters_.py?
On Aug 6, 9:08 am, mdipierro mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu wrote:
No. But you can remap into a different controller using routes.py
routes_in = [
('/myapp',
i voted this too.
I just dont like the controller named default and i want it different
on each apps.
On 8/6/10, mr.freeze nat...@freezable.com wrote:
Massimo, why not make the default application,controller and function
configurable in an external file like options.py or
parameters_.py?
@mr.freeze You can do it with routes.py . Why another config file?
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 6:40 PM, Phyo Arkar phyo.arkarl...@gmail.com wrote:
i voted this too.
I just dont like the controller named default and i want it different
on each apps.
On 8/6/10, mr.freeze nat...@freezable.com
Not another config file, just another config option. Why have the
overhead and complexity of a routes regex when you could just set it
explicitly in an existing config file? Just seems more straightforward
and user friendly to me.
On Aug 6, 12:26 pm, Albert Abril albert.ab...@gmail.com wrote:
9 matches
Mail list logo
