[web2py] Re: mongoDBAdapter test ......

2011-08-07 Thread Francisco Costa
On Aug 6, 6:34 pm, joseph simpson wrote: > It is my understanding that some people are interested but they do not have > the time to create the adapter. > > May or may not have time to test but would put it on the priority list. > > Have fun I would fully test the adapter

Re: [web2py] Re: mongoDBAdapter test ......

2011-08-06 Thread joseph simpson
It is my understanding that some people are interested but they do not have the time to create the adapter. May or may not have time to test but would put it on the priority list. Have fun On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 5:15 AM, Francisco Costa wrote: > On Aug 4, 7:05 pm, Massimo Di Pierro > wrote: >

[web2py] Re: mongoDBAdapter test ......

2011-08-05 Thread Francisco Costa
On Aug 4, 7:05 pm, Massimo Di Pierro wrote: > Nobody is really pushing for this... nobody has provided any feedback > about the adapter. I think there is a lot of people interested in this: http://groups.google.com/group/web2py/browse_thread/thread/ec2a16b9f4e957a0 http://www.google.com/search?q

[web2py] Re: mongoDBAdapter test ......

2011-08-04 Thread Massimo Di Pierro
Nobody is really pushing for this... nobody has provided any feedback about the adapter. On Aug 4, 11:10 am, Francisco Costa wrote: > > I will look at this again when I get a chance... > > When will MongoDBAdapter finalize so we can use it with DAL?

[web2py] Re: mongoDBAdapter test ......

2011-08-04 Thread Francisco Costa
> I will look at this again when I get a chance... When will MongoDBAdapter finalize so we can use it with DAL?

Re: [web2py] Re: mongoDBAdapter test ......

2011-06-24 Thread joseph simpson
Thanks for the information. I will look at this again when I get a chance... Joe On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 5:25 AM, David Watson wrote: > Hi Joe, > > That report is generated because the types dictionary for that key > doesn't have a value that encodes a template for the field.length to > be writ

[web2py] Re: mongoDBAdapter test ......

2011-06-21 Thread David Watson
Hi Joe, That report is generated because the types dictionary for that key doesn't have a value that encodes a template for the field.length to be written into. If you look at the types at the top of the class, you'll notice that some types do have a template value and some do not. Unfortunately,