On Feb 17, 5:24 pm, mdipierro wrote:
> You are right this not a reason not to move. The main reason is
> backward compatibility. In general 3.x seems to be slower than 2.x for
> data intensive processes. Am I wrong?
The Python 3.X stream is getting better performance wise and the GIL
changes th
You are right this not a reason not to move. The main reason is
backward compatibility. In general 3.x seems to be slower than 2.x for
data intensive processes. Am I wrong?
On Feb 17, 12:05 am, Graham Dumpleton
wrote:
> On Feb 17, 4:20 pm, mdipierro wrote:
>
> > Look at this bug report
>
> >http
On Feb 17, 4:20 pm, mdipierro wrote:
> Look at this bug report
>
> http://bugs.python.org/issue7946
>
> specifically look at the benchmarks at the bottom. This kind of bugs
> affects web applications since they have threads with lots of IO. One
> more reason to stay with python 2.5 for now.
Fo
3 matches
Mail list logo
