No idea, but I think browser coverage is very good, except for some very
old systems.
Anthony
On Friday, June 3, 2016 at 5:47:13 PM UTC-4, Mark Graves wrote:
>
> Anthony,
>
> Any idea if the ISRG root CA is included in browsers yet?
>
>
>
Anthony,
Any idea if the ISRG root CA is included in browsers yet?
https://community.letsencrypt.org/t/which-browsers-and-operating-systems-support-lets-encrypt/4394
This is the most recent article I could find but it is over 6 months old.
-Mark
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 7:31 AM, Anthony
On Friday, May 27, 2016 at 5:39:04 AM UTC-4, Mark Graves wrote:
>
> Thank Niphlod and Anthony.
>
> I agree. The technology is not quite mainstream enough to really rely on
> yet.
>
About a month ago, it was already the third largest certificate authority
by number of certificates, and since
Thank Niphlod and Anthony.
I agree. The technology is not quite mainstream enough to really rely on
yet.
-Mark
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 6:13 AM, Niphlod wrote:
> better than http, for sure. Better than self-signed, an order of
> magnitude. But still I'd go for 60$ for basic
better than http, for sure. Better than self-signed, an order of magnitude.
But still I'd go for 60$ for basic cert for a production site rather than
using letsentcypt.
On Thursday, May 26, 2016 at 12:11:29 AM UTC+2, Mark Graves wrote:
>
> Has anyone used LetsEncrypt certificates or followed
Have a look at this client: https://hlandau.github.io/acme/.
Anthony
On Wednesday, May 25, 2016 at 6:11:29 PM UTC-4, Mark Graves wrote:
>
> Has anyone used LetsEncrypt certificates or followed the instructions
> below with web2py?
>
>
>
6 matches
Mail list logo