postgresql is supported even better than mysql. mysql has lots of
caveats (limits to one alter table per transaction, limit to size of
strings, etc.) that we have to deal with as exceptions.
On Oct 24, 1:08 pm, Gour wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Oct 2011 13:56:19 -0300
> Mariano Reingart
> wrote:
>
> > IM
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 3:08 PM, Gour wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Oct 2011 13:56:19 -0300
> Mariano Reingart
> wrote:
>
>> IMHO, although I've tested only sqlite, I think in python3 we can use
>> the same drivers (psycopg2 for python3) and they behave mostly the
>> same as in python2
>
> btw, is using of
On Mon, 24 Oct 2011 13:56:19 -0300
Mariano Reingart
wrote:
> IMHO, although I've tested only sqlite, I think in python3 we can use
> the same drivers (psycopg2 for python3) and they behave mostly the
> same as in python2
btw, is using of PostgreSQL in web2py equally well as MySQL?
Sincerely,
G
IMHO, although I've tested only sqlite, I think in python3 we can use
the same drivers (psycopg2 for python3) and they behave mostly the
same as in python2
About the "new" wsgi spec, I don't see major changes, they are
"cosmetic" regarding str/byte/unicode (in fact, pep-333 wsgi is
version 1.0, pe
Most of web2py was written with python 3 in mind. The one thing that
needs extensive testing is how forms and database drivers cope with
unicode. I am skeptical 2to3 will get that right because the wsgi
specs have changed and because python 3 will force us to use different
drivers.
On Oct 24, 9:09
Ovidio/Gour:
For web2py-py3k, the changes were made against the latest stable
release, changeset 2455:80b2c74561c0 tagged as R-1.99.2
The repo is at googlecode, reingart-web2py clone, py3k branch:
http://code.google.com/r/reingart-web2py/source/list?name=py3k
This is the diff:
http://code.goo
Mariano, what are necessary adjustments for this to happen, or run 2 to 3?.
where you made adjustments? and what were they? i'm curious to know this.
thanks.
Ovidio Marinho Falcao Neto
Web Developer
ovidio...@gmail.com
ITJP - itjp.net.br
On Sun, 23 Oct 2011 19:59:14 -0300
Mariano Reingart
wrote:
> I didn't have time to work on it but I expect for December to have a
> full version of web2py seamless working on py3k.
Do you work with the web2py's trunk?
Sincerely,
Gour
--
While contemplating the objects of the senses, a perso
Ovidio:
I'm working in a python 3 upgrade (web2py-py3k), you can take a look at:
http://code.google.com/r/reingart-web2py/source/browse/?name=py3k
Some screenshots:
web2py-py3k: welcome app running python 3! http://pic.twitter.com/BR5PqAJ8
web2py-py3k: after 2to3 and 1 hour of minor fixes, web
Massimo , this means that one version may be next Web3py ?
Ovidio Marinho Falcao Neto
Web Developer
ovidio...@gmail.com
ITJP - itjp.net.br
83 8826 9088 - Oi
83 9334 0266 - Claro
Bra
On Sun, 23 Oct 2011 08:55:42 -0700 (PDT)
Massimo Di Pierro
wrote:
> We do not have a web2py roadmap but you can assume the basic logic
> will stay the same.
:-)
> Dal and templates will stay the same.
:-))
> helpers will stay the same.
:-)))
> Forms and form handling we do not know.
OK.
We do not have a web2py roadmap but you can assume the basic logic
will stay the same. Dal and templates will stay the same.
helpers will stay the same. Forms and form handling we do not know.
Bottom line: very relevant.
On Oct 23, 1:50 am, Gour wrote:
> There is some talk that web3py will proba
12 matches
Mail list logo
