Cherrypy was fantastic. I miss it. How can I use the latest version with
web2py now..? Any threads, ideas?
Thanks. Rahul D.
On Friday, June 8, 2012 8:20:12 AM UTC+5:30, Massimo Di Pierro wrote:
>
> agree.
>
> On Thursday, 7 June 2012 16:49:07 UTC-5, Derek wrote:
>>
>> Yeah, that whole "large fil
agree.
On Thursday, 7 June 2012 16:49:07 UTC-5, Derek wrote:
>
> Yeah, that whole "large files get corrupted when downloading" is a big
> issue...
>
> On Tuesday, June 5, 2012 1:14:14 PM UTC-7, Massimo Di Pierro wrote:
>>
>> Good reason to be busy. Anyway, if can assemble a team a people who can
Yeah, that whole "large files get corrupted when downloading" is a big
issue...
On Tuesday, June 5, 2012 1:14:14 PM UTC-7, Massimo Di Pierro wrote:
>
> Good reason to be busy. Anyway, if can assemble a team a people who can
> reproduce the problem, I can help fix it over IRC chat. Next week.
>
>
Good reason to be busy. Anyway, if can assemble a team a people who can
reproduce the problem, I can help fix it over IRC chat. Next week.
On Tuesday, 5 June 2012 14:10:22 UTC-5, mcm wrote:
>
> IIRC Tim is busy with is little (real) baby. I am sure he did not
> forget rocket...
>
> mic
>
> 20
IIRC Tim is busy with is little (real) baby. I am sure he did not
forget rocket...
mic
2012/6/5 Massimo Di Pierro :
> I still think rocket is the best (speed and design compromise) but I am not
> sure Tim is till maintaining it. If rocket is no longer maintained we should
> revert to cherrypy. I
I still think rocket is the best (speed and design compromise) but I am not
sure Tim is till maintaining it. If rocket is no longer maintained we
should revert to cherrypy. It supports ssl and has proved its worth.
On Monday, 4 June 2012 18:17:57 UTC-5, pbreit wrote:
>
> Well that's a problem a
Well that's a problem and supports my initial intuition. I'm not sure how
it can be considered "production-ready" without SSL.
On Monday, June 4, 2012 1:21:10 PM UTC-7, Anthony wrote:
>
> No SSL, though.
>
> On Monday, June 4, 2012 4:12:16 PM UTC-4, pbreit wrote:
>>
>> Ordinarily I would not thi
No SSL, though.
On Monday, June 4, 2012 4:12:16 PM UTC-4, pbreit wrote:
>
> Ordinarily I would not think much of it but it actually looks interesting
> considering it is pure Python, supposedly production ready and "very
> acceptable performance".
>
>
> On Monday, June 4, 2012 7:03:11 AM UTC-7,
Ordinarily I would not think much of it but it actually looks interesting
considering it is pure Python, supposedly production ready and "very
acceptable performance".
On Monday, June 4, 2012 7:03:11 AM UTC-7, Vasile Ermicioi wrote:
>
> hi,
> what do you think about waitress webserver?
>
> htt
9 matches
Mail list logo
