Kuba,
Thanks for taking the time to test this. I've found a bug in the Linux
version that hinders performance. I think you'll see things improve a
great deal with this next minor version.
Thanks,
-tim
On 3/17/2010 8:20 PM, Kuba Kucharski wrote:
This is probably obvious but I decided to
What this thread means: will we have a new wsgi server for web2py (instead
of cherrypy) ?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
web2py-users group.
To post to this group, send email to web...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
@Tim
do you have the fix already in launchpad? if yes can you tell me how
to replace rocket with the newest one inside web2py?
--
Kuba
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
web2py-users group.
To post to this group, send email to
This is probably obvious but I decided to try this myself:
Should one run web2py with Pound on multi-core server?
probably yes if you deal with concurrent connections..
This is my config:
2.6.31-19-generic-pae
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5410 @ 2.33GHz
Ubuntu 64bit
one processor with 4 cores
disk
maybe Im a bit ignorant, but what is pound?
alex
El 18/03/2010 2:20, Kuba Kucharski escribió:
This is probably obvious but I decided to try this myself:
Should one run web2py with Pound on multi-core server?
probably yes if you deal with concurrent connections..
This is my config:
http://web2py.com/book/default/section/11/12?search=pound
http://www.apsis.ch/pound/
kernel is 2.6.31-14-server not PAE of course.. sorry for mistakes.
I didn't mentioned but I had also executed some sysctl and ulimit
tweaking before benchmarking.
I ran tests again with the same configuration
6 matches
Mail list logo
