Re: [web2py] Re: Contribution

2011-10-29 Thread Matteo Harutunian
Hi Anthony, thanks, that looks promising, maybe we can find something in one of the links. We also had a brief look at the issue list before, but were uncertain whether or not its up to date or if the mentioned issues are of interest to the project. I guess we will have a closer look to filter

Re: [web2py] Re: Contribution

2011-10-29 Thread Anthony
On Saturday, October 29, 2011 8:58:23 AM UTC-4, Hong-Khoan wrote: > > Hi, > > sure. But unfortunately for our practical course we need to fix at least > one non-trivial bugfix or implement a feature. > Maybe look here for bugs and some feature requests: http://code.google.com/p/web2py/issues/list

Re: [web2py] Re: Contribution

2011-10-29 Thread Hong-Khoan Quach
Hi, sure. But unfortunately for our practical course we need to fix at least one non-trivial bugfix or implement a feature. Regards Hong-Khoan Am 27.10.2011 23:29, schrieb Triquetra: > I'm sure assistance with documentation would be appreciated by all! > > On Oct 26, 10:16 am, Hong-Khoan Quach

Re: [web2py] Re: Contribution

2011-10-26 Thread Richard Vézina
I just read the doc... Not sure what I suggest is possible... According to the doc it would need something like this to work: auth.has_permission(group_id, 'read', 'table123', field123 == 'something') This would lead to check if a user as the permission read on table123 when field123 has the valu

Re: [web2py] Re: Contribution

2011-10-26 Thread Richard Vézina
And why the object could not be a query that can return a list of records having the state you are looking for?? Richard On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 8:25 PM, Triquetra < trique...@triquetradevelopment.com> wrote: > No, I don't think this helps, unless I'm misunderstanding something > (which is possi