Texy features are very good http://texy.info/en/syntax
but the syntax is ugly...
I would like markmin to implement all that features in a beauty way.
2010/8/2 Tim Michelsen
> > No that I can think of.
> Would be good if you could use one of the major markup languages as input:
> http://en.wiki
On Jul 7, 2010, at 3:47 PM, mdipierro wrote:
> I do not have a strong opposition and I see the advantages in terms of
> notation but I have two problems:
>
> The page:slug notation is handled by plugin_wiki, not by markmin.
> markmin just treats url, #anchor, url#anchor, page:slug all in the
> sa
I like so much the name cube9!
PLEASE don't put it 'cu29' because 'cu' in Portuguese is...well, not a
good word. :-)
--
Álvaro Justen - @turicas
http://blog.justen.eng.br/
21 9898-0141
I thought about the idea of making a frontend (i.e. in the web admin) to
edit routes.py and make more customizable the urls.
But don't know how implement it.
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 12:48 PM, mdipierro wrote:
> Please feel free to propose for new features. That was exactly the
> intention.
>
>
On Jul 7, 2010, at 3:47 PM, mdipierro wrote:
> I do not have a strong opposition and I see the advantages in terms of
> notation but I have two problems:
I'm tied up today, so just a quick note. I understand and generally agree with
your caveats. I have a couple of thoughts on the subject that I
I guess you should update web2py from the development repository (on google
code)
-Mathieu
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 16:40, Scott wrote:
> I just checked out the cube2py repository from code.google.com and am
> attempting to run it on the Source branch of web2py 1.79.2 (2010-06-08
> 22:45:26). At
On Jul 7, 2010, at 3:14 PM, mdipierro wrote:
> Right now you can do links with
>
> url
> [[name url]]
> [[name #anchor]]
> [[name url#anchor]]
> [[name page:slug]]
>
> and define an anchor with
>
> [[anchor]]
>
> If I understand your suggestions:
> 1) also allow
> [[url]]
> [[url#anchor]]
> [[
Same as Kenneth
I vote +1 cube2py and Cube^2 +1
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 10:31 PM, Kenneth wrote:
> I vote +1 cube2py and Cube^2 +1
>
> Kenneth
>
>
Back to naming, should we vote?
Here are the suggestions so far:
1) cu29
2) cube2py
3) w2cube
4) cube29
5) Cube^2
For me +1 for cube2py and +1 for cube29.
Which ones do you people prefer?
Cheers,
Julio Monteiro
On Jul 7, 2010, at 8:25 AM, mdipierro wrote:
> you link pages with
>
> [[this is the link text page:this-is-the-slug]]
So page: is recognized by the wiki plugin?
If I'm understanding the syntax, and I may not be, I have a suggestion.
[[name]] and [[name#anchor]] should be wiki links; [[#ancho
I should say that the template used (seen in the video) is very pretty.
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 7:35 PM, mdipierro wrote:
> The google code repository is corrupted. There are lots of files that
> do not belong there I will close it and open a new one later
> today. Let's agree on a new name.
On Jul 7, 2010, at 8:30 AM, mdipierro wrote:
> The idea is that any web app is a set of pages that contain stuff.
> Some are public some are not, some have other permissions, some are
> listed in a hierarchical menu some not. Therefore it should be
> possible to develop as app as one creates a wik
This looks really awesome!
Name suggestion: Cube^2
--
Thadeus
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Jonathan Lundell wrote:
> On Jul 7, 2010, at 5:42 AM, mdipierro wrote:
>
>> The philosophy is the same as T3. Every URL is a wiki.
>
> Would you elaborate a little on that statement, please?
>
On Jul 7, 2010, at 5:42 AM, mdipierro wrote:
> The philosophy is the same as T3. Every URL is a wiki.
Would you elaborate a little on that statement, please?
Can we suggest names?
What about "cube2py" or "w2cube" or even simply "cube29"?
Julio Monteiro
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 10:15 AM, mdipierro wrote:
> I am going to remane this cu29 since it has been brought to my
> attention that there is a cube9.net and we do not want problems
>
>
>
> On 7 Lu
15 matches
Mail list logo
