Re: [webkit-dev] AtMail 5.x and Safari

On Jul 31, 2007, at 3:07 PM, David D. Kilzer wrote: Joe Auty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Apparently the developers are working on adding Safari advanced interface support, but in the meantime I was sort of curious as to what the technical hurdles may have been with supporting Safari? Does

Re: [webkit-dev] AtMail 5.x and Safari

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 David D. Kilzer wrote: > Joe Auty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Apparently the developers are working on adding Safari advanced >> interface support, but in the meantime I was sort of curious as to what >> the technical hurdles may have been with su

Re: [webkit-dev] AtMail 5.x and Safari

Joe Auty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Apparently the developers are working on adding Safari advanced > interface support, but in the meantime I was sort of curious as to what > the technical hurdles may have been with supporting Safari? Does Safari > have some issues with parsing XML documents th

[webkit-dev] AtMail 5.x and Safari

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, AtMail supports multiple interfaces - an interface designed for IE based browsers, an interface for Gecko/XUL based browsers that serves XML 1.0, and a catch-all simple interface for all other browsers. The simple interface is unfortunately the

Re: [webkit-dev] Different ways to build WebKit on Windows

On Tuesday 31 July 2007 14:52:23 Artem Ananiev wrote: > Hi, all, > > currently WebKit is built on Windows platform using Visual Studio > solution file: > >$(WebKitDir)/WebKit/win/WebKit.vcproj/WebKit.sln > > However, sometimes it's not easy to deal with .sln or .vcproj files, so > the question

[webkit-dev] Different ways to build WebKit on Windows

Hi, all, currently WebKit is built on Windows platform using Visual Studio solution file: $(WebKitDir)/WebKit/win/WebKit.vcproj/WebKit.sln However, sometimes it's not easy to deal with .sln or .vcproj files, so the question is: is it possible to to build WebKit on Windows platform using,