Michael Nordman [EMAIL PROTECTED], 2008-09-09 11:42 -0700:
What is the status of the work-in-progress around the HTML5 AppCache that is
in the repository? Is anybody actively working on that now? I'm interested
in incorporating support for this feature into Chrome is why I'm asking.
I'd been
9 sep 2008 kl. 20.42 skrev Michael Nordman:
What is the status of the work-in-progress around the HTML5 AppCache
that is in the repository? Is anybody actively working on that now?
I'm interested in incorporating support for this feature into Chrome
is why I'm asking.
Michael
Hey
At this point, I am at a total loss as I have yet to be able to build
anything.
Well, you got the error message. At the risk of pointing the obvious, I would
say just trace the error message to find out where it fails.
perl
On Sep 11, 2008, at 12:13 AM, Josh Chia (谢任中) wrote:
I did some more research. It seems that KJS does mark-and-sweep GC,
and the marking is to mark objects that are not known to be
unreachable, so that those left unmarked can be removed at the end.
Please correct me if I'm wrong.
More
Hi Josh,
When a C/C++ function allocates stack space (with decreasing the stack
pointer), it does not initialize the variables there. You need to
initialize them by assignment operators. Reading such variables by the GC
yields an error in valgrind.
Cheers,
Zoltan
Thanks for the reply. I have
On Sep 11, 2008, at 1:53 AM, Josh Chia (谢任中) wrote:
Thanks for the reply. I have three more questions regarding this.
1. I'm getting many valgrind memcheck errors. I've added a few
suppressions for them but I'm still getting tons of errors. Is this
normal?
I think valgrind is
Is it possible for a false positive on the stack to prevent an object from
being collected even after calling collect() multiple times?
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 9:45 AM, Maciej Stachowiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 11, 2008, at 1:53 AM, Josh Chia (谢任中) wrote:
Thanks for the reply. I
On Sep 11, 2008, at 10:57 AM, Josh Chia (谢任中) wrote:
Is it possible for a false positive on the stack to prevent an
object from being collected even after calling collect() multiple
times?
Sure. That's always theoretically possible with conservative garbage
collection. But in practice
I can assure you I've spent quite a bit of time attempting to debug and
build. Again I'm following the instructions on
http://trac.webkit.org/wiki/BuildingQtOnWindows as instructed by other
responders to my post.
There is a specific error that occurs prior to the build aborting. The
problem
9 matches
Mail list logo
