Re: [webkit-dev] ubuntu build problem

do anybody have a clue, or any pointers for me so that I can fix it myself? I have checked out revision 44600 today and it gives me build problem is there some stable version which I should be using? I am building it on ubuntu machine with command ./build-webkit --wx --wx-args="wxgc wxpython"

Re: [webkit-dev] about webkit's license in chrome

On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 10:44:25PM -0700, Peter Kasting wrote: > 2009/6/11 David Jones > > > As listed in http://code.google.com/chromium/terms.html#3rdparty , > > there're three different licenses of webkit in chrome: > > BSD /LGPL 2/LGPL > >

Re: [webkit-dev] about webkit's license in chrome

2009/6/11 David Jones > As listed in http://code.google.com/chromium/terms.html#3rdparty , > there're three different licenses of webkit in chrome: > BSD /LGPL 2/LGPL > 2.1 > > > Why? > For the same

[webkit-dev] about webkit's license in chrome

As listed in http://code.google.com/chromium/terms.html#3rdparty , there're three different licenses of webkit in chrome: BSD/LGPL 2/LGPL 2.1 Why? ___ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.

Re: [webkit-dev] arm jit

And here, I have to make a short comment on the non-acceptance of our ARM JIT implementation. In your mail you mention that you would remain reluctant to accept a duplicate of the JIT into the tree, rather than a port of the existing JIT utilizing the MacroAssembler abstraction. Well, did y

Re: [webkit-dev] to reitveld or not to reitveld

On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 5:19 PM, Jeremy Orlow wrote: > On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 4:50 PM, Joe Mason wrote: > >> Mark Rowe wrote: >> >>> >>> On 2009-06-11, at 15:16, Ojan Vafai wrote: >>> >>> On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Ojan Vafai >>> o...@google.com>> wrote: On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at

Re: [webkit-dev] to reitveld or not to reitveld

On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 4:50 PM, Joe Mason wrote: > Mark Rowe wrote: > >> >> On 2009-06-11, at 15:16, Ojan Vafai wrote: >> >> On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Ojan Vafai >> o...@google.com>> wrote: >>> >>>On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 7:51 AM, Mark Rowe >>> wrote: >>> >>>

Re: [webkit-dev] to reitveld or not to reitveld

Mark Rowe wrote: On 2009-06-11, at 15:16, Ojan Vafai wrote: On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Ojan Vafai > wrote: On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 7:51 AM, Mark Rowe mailto:mr...@apple.com>> wrote: There are also concerns about access to the data store of the

Re: [webkit-dev] to reitveld or not to reitveld

On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 3:21 PM, Mark Rowe wrote: > Given what has been said so far I'm still not clear why Rietvald is a > better option than Review Board. > I think it's because we have a bunch of people who are (a) familiar with using it and/or (b) work on it and can fix any problems, whereas

Re: [webkit-dev] to reitveld or not to reitveld

On 2009-06-11, at 15:16, Ojan Vafai wrote: On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Ojan Vafai wrote: On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 7:51 AM, Mark Rowe wrote: There are also concerns about access to the data store of the application, backup procedures, etc. Our existing servers are well understood in thi

Re: [webkit-dev] to reitveld or not to reitveld

On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Ojan Vafai wrote: > On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 7:51 AM, Mark Rowe wrote: > >> There are also concerns about access to the data store of the application, >> backup procedures, etc. Our existing servers are well understood in this >> regard. We've also found in the p

Re: [webkit-dev] Memory usage for Webkit

Hi, http://webkit.sed.hu/node/15 As you can see on the charts there, you should consider the whole environment not just WebKit alone. Large amount of resources are allocated by other libs as well. Zoltan > On 2009-06-11, at 12:50, James Howlett wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Is there any plan to reduce

[webkit-dev] DOM building in Webkit

Hi, Does Webkit build DOM element for things like 'comment' in the html document? and does it build DOM element for text with only non visible characters (e.g. "\n", " " , "\t")? Thank you. ___ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://

Re: [webkit-dev] Memory usage for Webkit

On 2009-06-11, at 12:50, James Howlett wrote: Hi, Is there any plan to reduce the memory usage of Webkit so that it uses less memory (runs better) on phone? if yes, where can I find ideas to reduce memory usage of Webkit (e.g. bug report, roadmap)? Memory footprint is an area that we are

[webkit-dev] Memory usage for Webkit

Hi, Is there any plan to reduce the memory usage of Webkit so that it uses less memory (runs better) on phone? if yes, where can I find ideas to reduce memory usage of Webkit (e.g. bug report, roadmap)? Thank you. ___ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@l

Re: [webkit-dev] arm jit

> If you're interested in review or commit rights, they're granted based > on a track record of good work, good judgement, and good > collaboration. You can read more about the policy here: > http://webkit.org/coding/commit-review-policy.html > . > > Please work on your collaboration skills. Righ

Re: [webkit-dev] A Javascript Programming Environment for Safari 4

On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 7:22 PM, David Goehrig wrote: > Hello Webkitties, > Let me say, congratulations on getting so close to having real HTML5 > support. While there are still some rough edges, Webkit has been making > some huge strides towards making the web a nice place to program. In the >

Re: [webkit-dev] arm jit

it looks we are in the way of the train. You have plans, we don't know about them, you have commit rights, we don't, so the tides are against us. If you're interested in review or commit rights, they're granted based on a track record of good work, good judgement, and good collaboration. Y

Re: [webkit-dev] Expected behavior of Mutex.lock()

Agreed the ASSERT needn't be Windows only. It's probably better to ASSERT rather than deadlock on platforms without reentrant implementations. :-) I'll file a bug for this (and might just fix it) in a couple days if there are no more comments. J On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Dmitry Titov w

Re: [webkit-dev] arm jit

On Jun 11, 2009, at 9:59 AM, Toshiyasu Morita wrote: --- On Wed, 6/10/09, Gavin Barraclough wrote: > If you consider calling a JS function with too few arguments as being akin to = > invoking a C++ method with some defaulted parameters not-provided, then it is > also the responsibility o

Re: [webkit-dev] Trampoline problem

On Jun 11, 2009, at 10:20 AM, Toshiyasu Morita wrote: I've tracked down a crash in our JIT port to a problem with the trampoline generation. The symptom of the crash is: the ScopeChain becomes corrupted and acquires the value of 1. void JIT::privateCompileCTIMachineTrampolines(RefPtr*

Re: [webkit-dev] arm jit

Can the arity check be performed at compile time as in C++? C++ can perform arity checks at compile time because C++ uses early binding. JavaScript uses late binding. Geoff___ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.

Re: [webkit-dev] How to execute a JavaScript containing site with JSCore?

Hi Sebastian. JSEvaluateScript can only evaluate JavaScript; it can't parse HTML. Cheers, Geoff On Jun 10, 2009, at 10:05 PM, Sebastian Linke wrote: Hi, based on my experiences when I ran some javascript code on a webkit context, I was trying to do the same with "normal" html code. It ma

[webkit-dev] Build number for Safari 4 final

Hi All, Which is build/release of Webkit is Safari 4 final ? Thanks and regards Sajesh ___ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev

Re: [webkit-dev] Expected behavior of Mutex.lock()

Then perhaps all implementations could ASSERT in debug on mutex reentrancy to help discover where differences in behavior are accidentally 'used' (a stuck thread may sometimes mask some other issues). It's not good to have this kind of differences in 'cross-platform' code, sooner or later it'll ca

[webkit-dev] Trampoline problem

I've tracked down a crash in our JIT port to a problem with the trampoline generation. The symptom of the crash is: the ScopeChain becomes corrupted and acquires the value of 1. void JIT::privateCompileCTIMachineTrampolines(RefPtr* executablePool, void** ctiArrayLengthTrampoline, void** ctiSt

Re: [webkit-dev] arm jit

--- On Wed, 6/10/09, Gavin Barraclough wrote: >  If you consider calling a JS function with too few arguments as being akin to = > invoking a C++ method with some defaulted parameters not-provided, then it is > also the responsibility of code generated for the call to such a method to ensure

Re: [webkit-dev] How to interrupt Webkit Dump Render Tree output

On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 1:58 PM, tonikitoo (Antonio Gomes) wrote: > On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 1:31 PM, Simon Fraser wrote: >> There is a method on RenderObject to get the correct absolute coordinates of >> the renderer, which correctly takes transforms, scrolling etc into account: >> RenderObject::loc

Re: [webkit-dev] NPAPI Plugin on openembedded

Hi: Sorry for ambiguous describing. My testing environment was list as follows: 1. qemu arm linux (based on poky linux) 2. qemu x86 linux (based on poky linux) 3. Ubuntu 8.10 I adopt poky linux as my openembedded developing environment. The flash plugin can be loaded on case 1 and case 3, but it

Re: [webkit-dev] GDOM-Binding: using gdom_css_style_sheet_add_rule()

On 6/10/09, Leon Winter wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi, > > the GDOM-Binding provides functions for setting up global CSS rules > and manipulating them. I'm interested in this functions, especially in: > > WEBKIT_API glong > gdom_css_style_sheet_add_rule (Gdo

Re: [webkit-dev] NPAPI Plugin on openembedded

On Thursday 11 June 2009 12:09:37 Graffine wrote: > Hi all: > > I port webkit/Gtk+ to openembedded and try to test flash plugin on > GtkLauncher. I take qemu to simulate the embedded environment, incluing > arm linux and x86 linux platform. I found that webkit cannot load any > plugins on x86 linux

Re: [webkit-dev] arm jit

Hi guys at Apple, it looks we are in the way of the train. You have plans, we don't know about them, you have commit rights, we don't, so the tides are against us. Hints on the mailing lists are scarce, although a year ago someone from you asked whether others are interested in design discussions,

[webkit-dev] NPAPI Plugin on openembedded

Hi all: I port webkit/Gtk+ to openembedded and try to test flash plugin on GtkLauncher. I take qemu to simulate the embedded environment, incluing arm linux and x86 linux platform. I found that webkit cannot load any plugins on x86 linux, but it can work well on arm linux. The following is my tes

Re: [webkit-dev] ubuntu build problem

I also tried to build source of nightly build WebKit-r44591 but it also gives same problem. rgds anurag From: anurag uniyal To: webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org Sent: Thursday, 11 June, 2009 1:39:28 PM Subject: ubuntu build problem I have checked out revision 4460

[webkit-dev] ubuntu build problem

I have checked out revision 44600 today and it gives me build problem is there some stable version which I should be using? I am building it on ubuntu machine with command ./build-webkit --wx --wx-args="wxgc wxpython" """ ranlib /home/anushri/try/WebKit/WebKitBuild/Release/libjscore.a g++ -o /hom

[webkit-dev] Reconstructing a RenderTree from a DOM

Hi, After the page loading is done (HTML/CSS has been parsed, JS has been executed), webkit builds a DOM and RenderTree. It is possible that I detach the RenderTree from the DOM (removed that in memory), and that later on , reconstructing the RenderTree for that DOM? and re-attached the RenderTree