Re: [webkit-dev] js-only-tests migration from "resources" to "script-tests"

2009-09-21 Thread Shinichiro Hamaji
Oops, I used wrong address again... The error was 409 Conflict. The error message of bugzilla-tools land-diff was Parsing ChangeLog: LayoutTests/ChangeLog svn: Commit failed (details follow): svn: MERGE request failed on '/repository/webkit/trunk/LayoutTests' svn: MERGE of '/repository/webkit/tru

Re: [webkit-dev] Runtime setting for incomplete features

2009-09-21 Thread Drew Wilson
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 1:22 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: > > Slightly better. The only real difference it would make is if someone tests > using a === comparison to undefined (as opposed to == or just a plain > boolean test). > > One reason why I'm pursuing this is that a naive google developer

Re: [webkit-dev] Runtime setting for incomplete features

2009-09-21 Thread Jeremy Orlow
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 1:22 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: > > On Sep 21, 2009, at 12:31 PM, Jeremy Orlow wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: > >> >> On Sep 18, 2009, at 1:30 PM, Jeremy Orlow wrote: >> >> On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 12:59 PM, Alexey Proskuryakov wrot

Re: [webkit-dev] Runtime setting for incomplete features

2009-09-21 Thread Maciej Stachowiak
On Sep 21, 2009, at 12:31 PM, Jeremy Orlow wrote: On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: On Sep 18, 2009, at 1:30 PM, Jeremy Orlow wrote: On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 12:59 PM, Alexey Proskuryakov wrote: 18.09.2009, в 12:24, Jeremy Orlow написал(а): I'm not sure if we

[webkit-dev] Reviews :)

2009-09-21 Thread Eric Seidel
We have a record 98 bugs in the review queue this morning. Please take a peak at the queue today if you can find time. :) https://bugs.webkit.org/buglist.cgi?field0-0-0=flagtypes.name&type0-0-0=equals&value0-0-0=review%3F -eric ___ webkit-dev mailing l

Re: [webkit-dev] Runtime setting for incomplete features

2009-09-21 Thread Jeremy Orlow
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: > > On Sep 18, 2009, at 1:30 PM, Jeremy Orlow wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 12:59 PM, Alexey Proskuryakov wrote: > >> >> 18.09.2009, в 12:24, Jeremy Orlow написал(а): >> >> I'm not sure if we've hit any compatibility issues with thi

Re: [webkit-dev] Runtime setting for incomplete features

2009-09-21 Thread Maciej Stachowiak
On Sep 18, 2009, at 1:30 PM, Jeremy Orlow wrote: On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 12:59 PM, Alexey Proskuryakov wrote: 18.09.2009, в 12:24, Jeremy Orlow написал(а): I'm not sure if we've hit any compatibility issues with this yet, but it seems quite plausible that someone would compare window.

Re: [webkit-dev] Runtime setting for incomplete features

2009-09-21 Thread Jeremy Orlow
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 11:42 AM, Drew Wilson wrote: > I think shooting for perfect compatibility might be nice, but is probably > not required. > I do think that we ought to be returning undefined instead of null in those > cases, though, just to catch people who are accidentally using isUndefin

Re: [webkit-dev] Runtime setting for incomplete features

2009-09-21 Thread Drew Wilson
I think shooting for perfect compatibility might be nice, but is probably not required. I do think that we ought to be returning undefined instead of null in those cases, though, just to catch people who are accidentally using isUndefined() utility functions from common libraries. It would not be h