Well, I ran build-webkit with the "--debug" option, and when I try to run
WebKit/WebKitBuild/Debug/JavaScriptCore/jsc , I get a failed assertion:
ASSERTION FAILED: !isHostFunctionNonInline()
(../../../JavaScriptCore/runtime/Executable.h:349 JSC::FunctionExecutable*
JSC::JSFunction::jsExecutable()
> How would I go about building jsc in debug mode? Is it possible to build a
> standalone jsc shell?
See https://lists.webkit.org/pipermail/webkit-qt/2010-January/89.html
for details.
--
Ariya Hidayat
http://www.linkedin.com/in/ariyahidayat
___
How would I go about building jsc in debug mode? Is it possible to build a
standalone jsc shell?
I'm using Qt Webkit, with the bulld-webkit and run-webkit scripts.
Thank you for your help,
- Maxime
Oliver Hunt-2 wrote:
>
> If you have a debug build of jsc, you can run 'jsc -d' and that will
Hi,
On Tue, 25 May 2010, Zoltan Horvath wrote:
[ Please redirect me if the question is off-topic here ]
webkit-help is the appropriate channel for this.
Okay - I'll send a possible patch there in this case, to build on Solaris
10.
Any hint or suggestion would be appreciated :)
You should
On May 25, 2010, at 7:54 AM, Chris Jerdonek wrote:
> I sometimes come across public member functions whose implementations do not
> depend on private data.
>
> There is a school of thought that such functions are better non-member
> because it reduces the number of functions coupled to private
On May 25, 2010, at 3:05 AM, TAMURA, Kent wrote:
>> Generally speaking I suggest we do not use the "m_" prefix for the members
>> of structs. And I suggest that classes with public data members be structs
>> instead of classes. Classes that have public data members only for
>> historical reason
Hi,
On Tuesday 25 May 2010, at 16:38, Xavier Roche wrote:
> Hi folks!,
>
> [ Please redirect me if the question is off-topic here ]
webkit-help is the appropriate channel for this.
> I am trying to build webkit (qt flavour, current 4.6.1 stable release) on
> Solaris, and I am facing weird SEG
Hi, I have a question regarding WebKit's stance on free functions.
I sometimes come across public member functions whose implementations
do not depend on private data.
There is a school of thought that such functions are better non-member
because it reduces the number of functions coupled to priv
Hi folks!,
[ Please redirect me if the question is off-topic here ]
I am trying to build webkit (qt flavour, current 4.6.1 stable release) on
Solaris, and I am facing weird SEGV issues when trying to use objects such
as QWebPage. The underlying issue seems to be related to the TCMalloc*
layer
2010/5/25 Darin Adler
On May 20, 2010, at 8:54 PM, TAMURA, Kent wrote:
> What's the naming rule for non-const static members?
>
> Some classes give "s_" prefixes:
> WebCore/page/DOMTimer.h: static double s_minTimerInterval;
> WebCore/page/GeolocationPositionCache.h: static int s_in
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 12:19 AM, Darin Adler wrote:
> On May 20, 2010, at 8:54 PM, TAMURA, Kent wrote:
>
> > What's the naming rule for non-const static members?
> >
> > Some classes give "s_" prefixes:
> > WebCore/page/DOMTimer.h:static double s_minTimerInterval;
> > WebCore/page/Geoloc
11 matches
Mail list logo
