Can we just include the headers in WebKit?
Or find some way to auto-download them?
This seems silly. Or certainly requiring an update to
http://webkit.org/building/tools.html.
-eric
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 3:56 PM, Tony Gentilcore wrote:
> Quick PSA: if you install the "Java for Mac OS X 10.6
Hi Alexey, thank you for revising this topic!
I understand your concern about having a testing infrastructure inside
the production code.
On the other hand, having separate but similar mocks for each port
hurts our productivity.
And we cannot automate testing without mocks anyway.
So how about to
Hi.
Thanks for the feedback, Ojan and Ryosuke.
>From the experiments I've been doing, I think it will be a smooth
landind. The platform specific editing behavior code paths are not
that common in the tests in LayoutTests/editing, and the tests that go
through them were converted to use the
Layout
If this is part of ECMAScript, it should be in the JavaScript engine
proper, not in WebCore. With respect to missing features of the IDL
compiler, we add features to the IDL compiler as we need them.
There's lots of stuff in WebIDL that we haven't needed to implement
yet.
Adam
On Wed, Oct 27,
Hi,
I am working on JavaScript API that implements basic i18n operations, like
formatting numbers, dates, sorting... We are actually working with
EcmaScript committee on standardizing the API.
My goal is to have a prototype to showcase for the next meeting (mid
November) and I am making local ch
Sorry for the delayed response, Tony. My answers inline.
On Sep 3, 2010, at 9:35 AM, Tony Chang wrote:
> I'm curious what elements the UIRequestEvents apply to. Does it fire at the
> document level or does it fire for specific elements like textareas?
Focused element (or AX-focused element) wh
-- Forwarded message --
From: Ryosuke Niwa
Date: Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 2:31 PM
Subject: Re: [webkit-dev] Platform specific editing behaviors
To: Antonio Gomes
Cc: webkit-dev Development
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 2:17 PM, Antonio Gomes wrote:
> Well, despite the naming to be used
This matches Chromium's desired behavior and is only a change for Chromium
Linux. So, no objections there.
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 2:17 PM, Antonio Gomes wrote:
> Hi.
>
> In bug https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36627 (Needs a
> "LinuxEditingBehavior", perhaps with a better name) , in orde
Hi.
In bug https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36627 (Needs a
"LinuxEditingBehavior", perhaps with a better name) , in order to
supply needs that the existing editing behaviors (Mac and Windows) do
not cover, we are going to add a new editing behavior type. The name
is not defined yet, and our
02.08.2010, в 4:38, Alexey Proskuryakov написал(а):
>
> 29.07.2010, в 8:16, Adam Barth написал(а):
>
>> Plumbing this mock API all the way through WebKit for each port seems like a
>> waste.
>
>
> One benefit of this is that it makes us test the API layer. Another one is
> that it gives Web
10 matches
Mail list logo
