Re: [webkit-dev] Webkit handling of plug-ins out-of-process on the mac

2011-03-09 Thread Sam Weinig
WebKit has had the ability to run plugins out of process on the mac for quite some time. We recently reimplemented a bunch of that functionality to share infrastructure with WebKit's general out-of-process strategy, and that code can be found http://trac.webkit.org/browser/trunk/Source/WebKit2/Plu

Re: [webkit-dev] What's up with the Chromium EWS bots?

2011-03-09 Thread Kevin Ollivier
Working great now! Thanks! Kevin On Mar 9, 2011, at 10:57 AM, Eric Seidel wrote: > I believe I've fixed the cr-mac bot now too. Please let me know if > you have any further trouble. > > You won't need to resubmit your patches. :) > > On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Adam Barth wrote: >> Sorr

[webkit-dev] Webkit handling of plug-ins out-of-process on the mac

2011-03-09 Thread Rudi Sherry
Sorry if this is the wrong forum. Is WebKit adding the capability to load plug-ins out-of-process on the mac? If so, would this forum be the right one for questions about how this is done, and technical specifics about it? If not, where? Thanks, Rudi __

Re: [webkit-dev] What's up with the Chromium EWS bots?

2011-03-09 Thread Eric Seidel
I believe I've fixed the cr-mac bot now too. Please let me know if you have any further trouble. You won't need to resubmit your patches. :) On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Adam Barth wrote: > Sorry for the disruption.  I believe I've fixed the problem.  No > further action should be needed on

Re: [webkit-dev] What's up with the Chromium EWS bots?

2011-03-09 Thread Adam Barth
Sorry for the disruption. I believe I've fixed the problem. No further action should be needed on your part. Adam On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 9:39 AM, Kevin Ollivier wrote: > Thanks for looking into this! Just let me know if I need to re-submit the > patch or anything after the bots are fixed. >

Re: [webkit-dev] Page Visibility API

2011-03-09 Thread Shishir Agrawal
Although some use cases are covered by window.onblur, it also fires when a window looses focus, but may still be visible. Thanks Shishir On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Charles Pritchard wrote: > requestAnimationFrame may provide a method for 'pausing', when following a > window blur event. >

Re: [webkit-dev] consensus?

2011-03-09 Thread Adam Barth
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 4:47 AM, Adam Bergkvist wrote: > On 2011-03-08 22:52, Adam Barth wrote: >> There was as long thread on webkit-dev a few weeks ago entitled >> "Implementing the  element".  Did you two reach some sort of >> consensus on that thread?  Would one or both of you be willing to >>

Re: [webkit-dev] What's up with the Chromium EWS bots?

2011-03-09 Thread Kevin Ollivier
Thanks for looking into this! Just let me know if I need to re-submit the patch or anything after the bots are fixed. Kevin On Mar 9, 2011, at 9:16 AM, Eric Seidel wrote: > I'm told the Skia repository was rebuilt from scratch. We'll need to > remove the skia directory on these bots to let the

Re: [webkit-dev] What's up with the Chromium EWS bots?

2011-03-09 Thread Eric Seidel
I'm told the Skia repository was rebuilt from scratch. We'll need to remove the skia directory on these bots to let them check it out again: http://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/group/chromium-dev/browse_thread/thread/e4cb6956c9ef0b39?pli=1 On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 11:12 AM, Eric Seidel wrote:

Re: [webkit-dev] What's up with the Chromium EWS bots?

2011-03-09 Thread Eric Seidel
Looks like the cr-linux bots svn checkout got corrupted. Adam has access and can rebuild it: http://queues.webkit.org/results/8110874 The cr-mac bot looks like it's having similar trouble: http://queues.webkit.org/results/8118430 I can look at rebuildign that one. I wonder what went wrong with

[webkit-dev] What's up with the Chromium EWS bots?

2011-03-09 Thread Kevin Ollivier
Hi all, I've got a patch that has been waiting in the queue for over a day now, and it's still in position #6 for cr-linux and #7 for cr-mac. The position has changed over that time, so it seems the bots are processing patches, but they're going incredibly slowly. All the other bots finished pr

Re: [webkit-dev] consensus?

2011-03-09 Thread Adam Bergkvist
Hi Adam On 2011-03-08 22:52, Adam Barth wrote: > Hi Adam and Leandro, > > There was as long thread on webkit-dev a few weeks ago entitled > "Implementing the element". Did you two reach some sort of > consensus on that thread? Would one or both of you be willing to > summarize your conclusio

Re: [webkit-dev] Implementing the element

2011-03-09 Thread Adam Bergkvist
Hi, On 2011-02-28 19:01, Leandro Graciá Gil wrote: > I'm glad we agree on the importance of allowing the user to revoke > device access. However we think that this point is important at the > design level rather than the implementation level. If access revoking > is introduced, then the concept