Re: [webkit-dev] bugid in ChangeLog

2011-03-26 Thread David Levin
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 3:24 AM, Patrick Gansterer wrote: > Hi, > > Sometimes folks commit changes without bug numbers. If those changes breaks > things it's hard to find the correct context for the change. > Can we make the bug number a requirement for a commit when it has a > corresponding bug?

Re: [webkit-dev] bugid in ChangeLog

2011-03-26 Thread Patrick Gansterer
Am 26.03.2011 um 19:30 schrieb Brent Fulgham: > I don't want to have a bug report for everything either, but I do agree that > my failure to include it in the changelog for the FontPlatformData change was > a stupid oversight. > > I'll make sure to avoid that mistake in the future! I didn't wa

Re: [webkit-dev] bugid in ChangeLog

2011-03-26 Thread Ryosuke Niwa
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 10:41 AM, Darin Adler wrote: > On Mar 26, 2011, at 3:24 AM, Patrick Gansterer wrote: > > > Sometimes folks commit changes without bug numbers. If those changes > breaks things it's hard to find the correct context for the change. > > Can we make the bug number a requiremen

Re: [webkit-dev] bugid in ChangeLog

2011-03-26 Thread Dirk Schulze
> If you use webkit-patch everything just magically works (yay!!) > > --Oliver > I agree! And if people would use it on uploading patches to a bug report, we wouldn't need a style-bot. Dirk ___ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org htt

Re: [webkit-dev] bugid in ChangeLog

2011-03-26 Thread Oliver Hunt
If you use webkit-patch everything just magically works (yay!!) --Oliver On Mar 26, 2011, at 11:30 AM, Brent Fulgham wrote: > > On Mar 26, 2011, at 10:41 AM, Darin Adler wrote: > >> On Mar 26, 2011, at 3:24 AM, Patrick Gansterer wrote: >> >>> Sometimes folks commit changes without bug numbers

Re: [webkit-dev] bugid in ChangeLog

2011-03-26 Thread Brent Fulgham
On Mar 26, 2011, at 10:41 AM, Darin Adler wrote: > On Mar 26, 2011, at 3:24 AM, Patrick Gansterer wrote: > >> Sometimes folks commit changes without bug numbers. If those changes breaks >> things it's hard to find the correct context for the change. >> Can we make the bug number a requirement f

Re: [webkit-dev] bugid in ChangeLog

2011-03-26 Thread Darin Adler
On Mar 26, 2011, at 3:24 AM, Patrick Gansterer wrote: > Sometimes folks commit changes without bug numbers. If those changes breaks > things it's hard to find the correct context for the change. > Can we make the bug number a requirement for a commit when it has a > corresponding bug? > IMHO it

[webkit-dev] bugid in ChangeLog

2011-03-26 Thread Patrick Gansterer
Hi, Sometimes folks commit changes without bug numbers. If those changes breaks things it's hard to find the correct context for the change. Can we make the bug number a requirement for a commit when it has a corresponding bug? IMHO it would be great if the style bot and the reviewer complain ab

[webkit-dev] XMLReader Interface Patch & XML Prague 2011

2011-03-26 Thread Alex Milowski
I've just uploaded a patch for WebKit that provides event-oriented parser for XML called XMLReader that is a variant of the behavior of XMLHttpRequest but, instead of building a whole document DOM, it delivers "XML Events" to an EventListener. The implementation has very low memory consumption cha