Re: [webkit-dev] LayoutTests results fallback graph

2011-07-13 Thread Adam Barth
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote: > On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Adam Barth wrote: >> There are approximately 1500 redundant test results that we aren't >> able to collapse using our current fallback strategy. > > Can we make fallback explicitly specified by some file?  e.g

Re: [webkit-dev] LayoutTests results fallback graph

2011-07-13 Thread Ryosuke Niwa
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Adam Barth wrote: > > There are approximately 1500 redundant test results that we aren't > able to collapse using our current fallback strategy. > Can we make fallback explicitly specified by some file? e.g. we can have a fallbackOverride file in each platform di

Re: [webkit-dev] Request for Update to Windows Development Environment

2011-07-13 Thread Patrick Gansterer
Hi, Am 13.07.2011 um 22:38 schrieb Brent Fulgham: > Can we please move away from VS2005 in the near future? What can we > (outside of Apple) do to help make this possible? I've created already a CMake based version of AppleWindows port. I've compiled it with VS2010, but it should work with the

Re: [webkit-dev] LayoutTests results fallback graph

2011-07-13 Thread Adam Barth
That's correct. Theoretically, there might exist a fallback strategy that could remove this redundancy, but it might be arbitrarily complicated. Although one could argue that our current strategy is approaching arbitrary complexity. :) Adam On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Eric Seidel wrote:

Re: [webkit-dev] LayoutTests results fallback graph

2011-07-13 Thread Eric Seidel
I believe what Adam means by this (it wasn't immediately clear to me), is that we have 1500 redundant result files with duplicate git hashes to some other file. This could be calculated by the deduplicate_results.py script by removing any of the current fallback logic and just look at raw duplicat

Re: [webkit-dev] LayoutTests results fallback graph

2011-07-13 Thread Adam Barth
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Adam Barth wrote: > On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Dirk Pranke wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 1:28 PM, Adam Barth wrote: >>> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 1:21 PM, Dirk Pranke wrote: On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 10:01 PM, Dirk Pranke wrote: > On Tue, Jul 12,

Re: [webkit-dev] LayoutTests results fallback graph

2011-07-13 Thread Adam Barth
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Dirk Pranke wrote: > On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 1:28 PM, Adam Barth wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 1:21 PM, Dirk Pranke wrote: >>> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 10:01 PM, Dirk Pranke wrote: On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 9:01 PM, Adam Barth wrote: > On Tue, Jul 12,

[webkit-dev] Request for Update to Windows Development Environment

2011-07-13 Thread Brent Fulgham
Hi Everyone, I've been working on getting WebGL running under Windows. An important part of this task is integrating the ANGLE software to handle shader translation, much as you currently do with the Mac build of WebKit. Unfortunately, the ANGLE sources in the WebKit archive will not build with

Re: [webkit-dev] LayoutTests results fallback graph

2011-07-13 Thread Dirk Pranke
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 1:28 PM, Adam Barth wrote: > On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 1:21 PM, Dirk Pranke wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 10:01 PM, Dirk Pranke wrote: >>> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 9:01 PM, Adam Barth wrote: On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 8:34 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote: > On Tue, Jul 12

Re: [webkit-dev] LayoutTests results fallback graph

2011-07-13 Thread Adam Barth
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 1:21 PM, Dirk Pranke wrote: > On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 10:01 PM, Dirk Pranke wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 9:01 PM, Adam Barth wrote: >>> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 8:34 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote: On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Dirk Pranke wrote: > > Hum. I

Re: [webkit-dev] LayoutTests results fallback graph

2011-07-13 Thread Dirk Pranke
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 10:01 PM, Dirk Pranke wrote: > On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 9:01 PM, Adam Barth wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 8:34 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote: >>> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Dirk Pranke wrote: Hum. I take it back ... it still wouldn't be a tree, since chr