I couldn't find nightly.webkit.org in the SVN repo. Below is a patch
that adds the Google Chrome Canary to the list of available WebKit
nightly builds. The referenced image (download-chromium.png) can be
obtained from:
Hi Geoffrey,
From what I understand, HTML5 Web Worker doesn't rely on threaded GC
because each worker thread has its own heap. The other place affected
by ENABLE_JSC_MULTIPLE_THREADS is JSLock. However it is also said
platforms other than MacOS doesn't need to implement JSLock. It seems
the only
I agree - a media element with controls ought to be keyboard-accessible by
default. Right now it doesn't appear that you can even make an audio or
video element play in WebKit even if it is focused.
Firefox seems to treat the whole set of controls as one focusable element -
you can use the
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 12:04 PM, Deepak Sherveghar bpw...@motorola.comwrote:
As with current Webkit behavior, only media elements with tab-index
attribute specified can be focused with keyboard (TAB key).
From a usability as well as accessibility perspective, we should be able to
focus (via
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 7:30 AM, Dominic Mazzoni dmazz...@google.comwrote:
An alternative approach would be to make each individual subcontrol
focusable - the play/pause button, the seek slider, and the volume slider,
plus potentially other controls for video.
What would script see as
Ryosuke,
On 09/13/2011 07:06 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
Yeah, they're outdated to say the least. Can we merge those two lists?
I think we can move information inside committers.py into a JSON file
and load it automatically on the wiki.
I don't know how to add arbitrary HTML on a wiki page,
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Leandro Pereira lean...@profusion.mobiwrote:
I don't know how to add arbitrary HTML on a wiki page, but I made a page
that loads loads committers.py and presents it in a web-friendly way:
Hi Patrick.
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Patrick Gansterer par...@paroga.com wrote:
How do we measure an active port??? I maintain a buildbot for WinCe and
usually fix problems with the port within hours. Unfortunately I don't get
paid to work on WebKit the whole day and so I can't make
From what I understand, HTML5 Web Worker doesn't rely on threaded GC
because each worker thread has its own heap.
That's the current implementation, yes. (But we may be able to do something
more efficient if we allow workers to rely on threaded GC.)
The other place affected
by
One of the things I admire about the WebKit project is that
historically the project has been very inclusive. One common thread
that's woven through a number of recent discussions is that folks feel
we've taken on too much complexity and that it's harder to make
fundamental improvements to the
Hi,
I completely agree with all of your points. I also don't think that it's your
task to keep every part time port working with every change.
IMO most of the is active questions come with a when do we remove the old
code/port from trunk question. That's not very cool to hear after the hard
Maybe we need a webkit-port-maintainers@ list that one could easily cc
rather than trying to add people by hand?
-- Dirk
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Patrick Gansterer par...@paroga.com wrote:
Hi,
I completely agree with all of your points. I also don't think that it's
your task to keep
hi
i want to update source tree using update-webkit script
but i have this error :
svn: OPTIONS of 'http://svn.webkit.org/repository/webkit/trunk': Could not
resolve hostname `svn.webkit.org': Temporary failure in name resolution (
http://svn.w
ebkit.org)
what should i do ?
--
*There's nothing
To mitigate this issue, Leandro (acidx) and I are working on change log
parser that can automatically detect active patch contributors and
reviewers. (See https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68061).
Having said that, I think contributors should help maintaining ports that
have bots on
What would script see as focused if we allow subcontrols be focusable?
Since controls are part of shadow DOM, scripts wont be able to see
that. In this case then they would probably end up with respective
media element.
Well, then that should be layout tested as well.
--
--Antonio Gomes
On 9/14/11 2:02 PM, Antonio Gomes wrote:
What would script see as focused if we allow subcontrols be
focusable?
Since controls are part of shadow DOM, scripts wont be able to see
that. In this case then they would probably end up with respective
media element.
Well, then
I've updated the spreadsheet of all ENABLE flags to match TOT (as of
this afternoon):
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AlC4tS7Ao1fIdHFVNUpFSDBudEF5WGM3WDNzQjI3Yncauthkey=CJCDiooKhl=en_US#gid=0
I've gone through the list and marked some of them that we might want
to change, listed
For those of you interested in this stuff, I have a patch to add a
webkit.org/team.html that auto-generates a list of contributors from
committers.py on https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68045.
This version doesn't include area of expertise but we can add it easily once
the bug 68061 is
== Always Enable ==
ENABLE(DETAILS) ???
ENABLE(DOM_STORAGE)
ENABLE(EVENTSOURCE)
ENABLE(INSPECTOR) ???
ENABLE(METER_TAG)
ENABLE(OFFLINE_WEB_APPLICATIONS)
ENABLE(PROGRESS_TAG)
ENABLE(SVG_ANIMATION) = Gated on ENABLE(SVG)
ENABLE(SVG_AS_IMAGE) = Gated on ENABLE(SVG)
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
ENABLE(SVG_ANIMATION) = Gated on ENABLE(SVG)
ENABLE(SVG_AS_IMAGE) = Gated on ENABLE(SVG)
ENABLE(SVG_DOM_OBJC_BINDINGS) = Gated on ENABLE(SVG)
ENABLE(SVG_FONTS) = Gated on ENABLE(SVG)
I think Eric is planning to get rid of
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
ENABLE(SVG_ANIMATION) = Gated on ENABLE(SVG)
ENABLE(SVG_AS_IMAGE) = Gated on ENABLE(SVG)
ENABLE(SVG_DOM_OBJC_BINDINGS) = Gated on ENABLE(SVG)
21 matches
Mail list logo
