On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 12:49 AM, Simon Hausmann
wrote:
> On Tuesday, April 24, 2012 03:59:47 PM Tor Arne Vestbø wrote:
>> On 24.04.12 15:55, ext Adam Roben wrote:
>> > Probably the biggest issue is for people who've been using
>> > git.webkit.org and now want to try out GitHub. Since the commits
Eric Seidel wrote:
> Assuming I'm understanding Kalle correctly, it seems this could
> already be accomplished with @media resolution?
>
> http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-mediaqueries/#resolution
>
> @media screen and (min-resolution: 264dpi) { … }
>
> Which according to:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
I would prefer something that works gracefully with img html tags, without
relying on CSS. Plus, it's the user agent that needs to make the decision of
which asset to request, not the server.
-Tom P.
On Apr 23, 2012, at 9:28 PM, Kalle Vahlman wrote:
> 2012/4/24 Tom Penzer :
>> Hi Everybody!
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 7:15 AM, Tor Arne Vestbø
wrote:
> On 24.04.12 16:04, ext Shezan Baig wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 9:55 AM, Adam Roben wrote:
>>
>>> In what situation does this cause issues?
>>>
>>> Probably the biggest issue is for people who've been using
>>> git.webkit.org a
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 7:04 AM, Shezan Baig wrote:
>> Probably the biggest issue is for people who've been using
>> git.webkit.org and now want to try out GitHub. Since the commits are
>> distinct between the two repositories, they have to do a full clone to
>> make the switch.
>
> In theory thou
On 04/20/2012 05:55 PM, Paul Sery wrote:
On 04/20/2012 08:25 AM, Andy Wingo wrote:
On Wed 18 Apr 2012 21:28, pgsery writes:
I want to call CodeBlock::dump from webcore in addition to the jsc
shell. I've compiled webkit-1.6.1 with the --enable-debug option,
modified dump to print to a file, in
On Tuesday, April 24, 2012 03:59:47 PM Tor Arne Vestbø wrote:
> On 24.04.12 15:55, ext Adam Roben wrote:
> > Probably the biggest issue is for people who've been using
> > git.webkit.org and now want to try out GitHub. Since the commits are
> > distinct between the two repositories, they have to do
On 24.04.12 16:04, ext Shezan Baig wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 9:55 AM, Adam Roben wrote:
In what situation does this cause issues?
Probably the biggest issue is for people who've been using
git.webkit.org and now want to try out GitHub. Since the commits are
distinct between the two repos
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 9:55 AM, Adam Roben wrote:
>> In what situation does this cause issues?
>
> Probably the biggest issue is for people who've been using
> git.webkit.org and now want to try out GitHub. Since the commits are
> distinct between the two repositories, they have to do a full clon
On 24.04.12 15:55, ext Adam Roben wrote:
Probably the biggest issue is for people who've been using
git.webkit.org and now want to try out GitHub. Since the commits are
distinct between the two repositories, they have to do a full clone to
make the switch.
Any idea why git is not smarter when p
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Tor Arne Vestbø
wrote:
> On 18.04.12 17:02, Simon Hausmann wrote:
>>
>> On Wednesday, April 18, 2012 06:53:46 AM ext Shezan Baig wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi WebKit,
>>>
>>> I've been using a fork of the following repo:
>>> https://github.com/WebKit/webkit
>>>
>>> However, ye
On 18.04.12 17:02, Simon Hausmann wrote:
On Wednesday, April 18, 2012 06:53:46 AM ext Shezan Baig wrote:
Hi WebKit,
I've been using a fork of the following repo:
https://github.com/WebKit/webkit
However, yesterday there was discussion on #webkit that the SHA-1 checksums
on this repo are differ
On Apr 24, 2012, at 9:07 AM, Adam Roben wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Jarred Nicholls wrote:
> (from correct address)
>
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Jarred Nicholls wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Simon Hausmann
> wrote:
> On Wednesday, April 18, 2012 06:53:46
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Adam Barth wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
> > Can we do some Bugzilla integration as Jarred suggested?
>
> If you're excited about using GitHub, you should feel free to do that work.
It sounds like there is already work going on o
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Jarred Nicholls wrote:
> (from correct address)
>
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Jarred Nicholls wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Simon Hausmann <
>> simon.hausm...@nokia.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Wednesday, April 18, 2012 06:53:46 AM ext Shezan Bai
Well that turned out ugly. Let's try again:
$ diff -u <(GIT_DIR=WebKit/.git git cat-file -p
df242ce698c19b591e975d88c29f7411b2f2963d) <(GIT_DIR=GitHubWebKit/.git git
cat-file -p 93f4255f7cb09996f0a9a354754c7902da87d1a3)
--- /dev/fd/63 2012-04-24 09:01:56.0 -0400
+++ /dev/fd/62 2012-04-24 0
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Simon Hausmann
wrote:
> On Wednesday, April 18, 2012 06:53:46 AM ext Shezan Baig wrote:
>> Hi WebKit,
>>
>> I've been using a fork of the following repo:
>> https://github.com/WebKit/webkit
>>
>> However, yesterday there was discussion on #webkit that the SHA-1 ch
I have updated to the latest Xcode.
My current hack for being able to build from the command line as well
as within Xcode is that I've manually added symlinks from
Source/WebCore/build -> ../../WebKitBuild (since it no longer seems
possible to set a global build directory). It seems to be working
18 matches
Mail list logo
