On Nov 15, 2012, at 4:56 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Mike Lawther wrote:
> On 16 November 2012 09:59, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
>
> While I don’t want to further agitate the issue or go off on a tangent, and
> agree that we must address the security aspect before get
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>
> I had a few more thoughts on this email besides the fragmentation aspect.
>
> On Nov 15, 2012, at 12:22 AM, Chris Evans wrote:
>
>
>> It still seems to me like the key difference is vtable vs no vtable,
>>
>
> It's an important differ
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Mike Lawther wrote:
> On 16 November 2012 09:59, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
>
>>
>> While I don’t want to further agitate the issue or go off on a tangent,
>> and agree that we must address the security aspect before getting rid of
>> RenderArena, only WebKit reviewers c
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Mike Lawther wrote:
> On 16 November 2012 09:59, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
>> While I don’t want to further agitate the issue or go off on a tangent,
>> and agree that we must address the security aspect before getting rid of
>> RenderArena, only WebKit reviewers can r-
On 16 November 2012 09:59, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
>
> While I don’t want to further agitate the issue or go off on a tangent,
> and agree that we must address the security aspect before getting rid of
> RenderArena, only WebKit reviewers can r- patches written by other
> contributors. You’re not eve
On Nov 15, 2012, at 2:59 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Chris Evans wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Geoffrey Garen wrote:
> On Nov 14, 2012, at 3:19 PM, Chris Evans wrote:
>
>> A first step might be to make it a platform define. For the Chromium
>> pla
I had a few more thoughts on this email besides the fragmentation aspect.
On Nov 15, 2012, at 12:22 AM, Chris Evans wrote:
>
> It still seems to me like the key difference is vtable vs no vtable,
>
> It's an important difference, but if we partitioned in to two based on that
> difference alo
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Chris Evans wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Geoffrey Garen wrote:
>
>> On Nov 14, 2012, at 3:19 PM, Chris Evans wrote:
>>
>> A first step might be to make it a platform define. For the Chromium
>> platform we'd leave the define "on" -- there are some
On Nov 15, 2012, at 2:16 PM, Chris Evans wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Geoffrey Garen wrote:
> On Nov 14, 2012, at 3:19 PM, Chris Evans wrote:
>
>> A first step might be to make it a platform define. For the Chromium
>> platform we'd leave the define "on" -- there are some nice
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Geoffrey Garen wrote:
> On Nov 14, 2012, at 3:19 PM, Chris Evans wrote:
>
> A first step might be to make it a platform define. For the Chromium
> platform we'd leave the define "on" -- there are some nice security
> properties we get from having the RenderObjec
On Nov 14, 2012, at 3:27 PM, Ojan Vafai wrote:
> As someone outside all these discussions, this seems like a completely unfair
> characterization of what happened. Sam voiced an objection, then there was a
> bunch of discussion in which Chris made an argument that Eric found
> compelling. Many
On Nov 14, 2012, at 3:19 PM, Chris Evans wrote:
> A first step might be to make it a platform define. For the Chromium platform
> we'd leave the define "on" -- there are some nice security properties we get
> from having the RenderObjects in their own spot. I'm happy to go in to more
> details
Since a common theme people are bringing up is vtable overrides, I do recall
reading about vtable masking being available in some compilers. I'm wondering
if we should push for support for such in compilers we use - I'm not sure what
the vcall perf hit is in such cases, but it would knock kill
It sounds like you meant to go to https://bugs.webkit.org/ and file a bug.
Thanks,
~Brady
On Nov 15, 2012, at 1:13 AM, HIDEKI YOSHIDA wrote:
> Hi,
>
> PAN(flick) to left operation collapse screen in Webkit(Safari) on window7
> tablet.
>
> Version:Safari 5.1.7(7534.57.2)
>
> Does anyone know
, Dominik Röttsches wrote:
On 11/14/2012 07:24 AM, ZhangJiPeng wrote:
The idea came from an embedded browser development project. Benjamin
I want to porting WebKit to a new platform, the platform can only
provide video address programming interface. So I need to porting
DirectFB, Cairo, GTK an
On 11/14/2012 07:24 AM, ZhangJiPeng wrote:
The idea came from an embedded browser development project. Benjamin I
want to porting WebKit to a new platform, the platform can only
provide video address programming interface. So I need to porting
DirectFB, Cairo, GTK and so on. However the hardwar
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 12:34 AM, Elliott Sprehn wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 3:22 AM, Chris Evans wrote:
>
>>
>>> ...
>>>
>>
>> My read on the Arena is that it's fragmentation resistant (i.e. it will
>> not repurpose a larger free chunk to satisfy a smaller allocation.)
>> However, memory
Hi,
PAN(flick) to left operation collapse screen in Webkit(Safari) on window7
tablet.
Version:Safari 5.1.7(7534.57.2)
Does anyone know this problem and the patch to resolve?
How to reproduce.
1) Launch Safai on Windows tablet. Set its window's width less than
960px.
2) Open http://jquerymobile
On Nov 15, 2012, at 12:22 AM, Chris Evans wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 11:32 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>
> On Nov 14, 2012, at 11:09 PM, Chris Evans wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 8:59 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 8:52 PM, Elliott Sprehn wrote:
>> I was pr
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 12:22 AM, Chris Evans wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 11:32 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>
>> rather than DOM vs. not DOM. Also having a per-document arena for DOM
>> nodes (as is done for render objects via RenderArena) seems irrelevant to
>> the security goal and likel
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 3:22 AM, Chris Evans wrote:
>
>> ...
>>
>
> My read on the Arena is that it's fragmentation resistant (i.e. it will
> not repurpose a larger free chunk to satisfy a smaller allocation.)
> However, memory usage at any given time is defined by peak usage since it
> cannot re
On Nov 15, 2012, at 12:02 AM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 11:37 PM, Chris Evans wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 10:29 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
> In other words, why are you interested in using the proposed allocation
> mechanism for only DOM nodes/objects instead of everythi
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 11:32 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>
> On Nov 14, 2012, at 11:09 PM, Chris Evans wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 8:59 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 8:52 PM, Elliott Sprehn wrote:
>>
>>> I was present for one of the discussions about the exploit
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 11:37 PM, Chris Evans wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 10:29 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
>
In other words, why are you interested in using the proposed allocation
>> mechanism for only DOM nodes/objects instead of everything in
>> WebCore/WebKit?
>>
>
> The challenge is to ad
24 matches
Mail list logo
