Re: [webkit-dev] Fwd: WebKit2 Extending Javascript

2013-04-17 Thread Christian Frost
Hi I ended up following Dominiks suggestion of changing some IDL files in WebCore. Also, I have added a NPAPI plugin. /Christian On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Dominik Röttsches dominik.rottsc...@intel.com wrote: On 04/04/2013 10:33 AM, Christian Frost wrote: My problem is that I have to

[webkit-dev] Implement ruby-overhang

2013-04-17 Thread Yuki Sekiguchi
Hi, I'd like to add support for ruby-overhang. The spec for this feature can be found here: http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-ruby/#rubyover I'm working it at this bug https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114678 My concern is that this patch changes the default behavior of overhanging ruby text. CSS

Re: [webkit-dev] Implement ruby-overhang

2013-04-17 Thread Maciej Stachowiak
Is this behavior change likely to affect any existing Web content, or other important content that uses html ruby markup such as books in EPUB format? - Maciej On Apr 17, 2013, at 12:26 AM, Yuki Sekiguchi yuki.sekigu...@access-company.com wrote: Hi, I'd like to add support for

Re: [webkit-dev] mouseenter and mouseleave events

2013-04-17 Thread Allan Sandfeld Jensen
On Tuesday 16 April 2013, you wrote: Hi On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 5:08 AM, Allan Sandfeld Jensen k...@carewolf.comwrote: I have recently uploaded a new patch to https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18930 to implement mouseenter and mouseleave events. This sounds nice, but shouldn't

Re: [webkit-dev] Implement ruby-overhang

2013-04-17 Thread Yuki Sekiguchi
Is this behavior change likely to affect any existing Web content, or other important content that uses html ruby markup such as books in EPUB format? Yes. All Web and EPUB contents which use ruby are affected by this change. I have no strong opinion about initial value of ruby-overhang. If you

Re: [webkit-dev] mouseenter and mouseleave events

2013-04-17 Thread Benjamin Poulain
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 12:46 AM, Allan Sandfeld Jensen k...@carewolf.comwrote: That is because it is not meant to be enabled any time soon. The CSS4 definitions are only there to guide our implementation so it behaves in a forward compatible way. The problem is we enabled a small part of

[webkit-dev] Reorganization of animation starting

2013-04-17 Thread Nándor Huszka
Hi All, There is an optimization problem related to animations. If we have one out of the visible viewport, it is still animated. (Try to scroll down on http://philbit.com/animatedgiftest.html) In this case it would be good to stop, then continue animations when it is required. Now a

Re: [webkit-dev] mouseenter and mouseleave events

2013-04-17 Thread Allan Sandfeld Jensen
On Wednesday 17 April 2013, Benjamin Poulain wrote: On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 12:46 AM, Allan Sandfeld Jensen k...@carewolf.comwrote: That is because it is not meant to be enabled any time soon. The CSS4 definitions are only there to guide our implementation so it behaves in a forward

Re: [webkit-dev] Implement ruby-overhang

2013-04-17 Thread Glenn Adams
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 1:26 AM, Yuki Sekiguchi yuki.sekigu...@access-company.com wrote: Hi, I'd like to add support for ruby-overhang. The spec for this feature can be found here: http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-ruby/#rubyover I'm working it at this bug

[webkit-dev] Global constructors attributes

2013-04-17 Thread Christophe Dumez - SISA
Hi, According to the Web IDL specification [1] (still valid in the latest Editor Draft [2]), global constructors should have the following attributes: { [[Writable]]: true, [[Enumerable]]: false, [[Configurable]]: true } Quoting from the specification: For every

Re: [webkit-dev] Implement ruby-overhang

2013-04-17 Thread David Hyatt
On Apr 17, 2013, at 2:26 AM, Yuki Sekiguchi yuki.sekigu...@access-company.com wrote: Hi, I'd like to add support for ruby-overhang. The spec for this feature can be found here: http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-ruby/#rubyover I'm working it at this bug

Re: [webkit-dev] Global constructors attributes

2013-04-17 Thread Ryosuke Niwa
This seems like a worthwhile change and I do support it but is it possible to make this fix behind a build flag or make it self-contained such that we can revert easily if needed? While I do agree with you that the compatibility risk is probably small, I'd like to make sure we have an option of

Re: [webkit-dev] Global constructors attributes

2013-04-17 Thread Christophe Dumez - SISA
Hi, The code change is actually really small. This is basically, 2/3 lines in the bindings generator. Alternatively, we could add [NotEnumerable, Deletable] before each *Constructor attribute in DOMWindow.idl but it seemed easier the patch the generator considering the number of such

Re: [webkit-dev] Reorganization of animation starting

2013-04-17 Thread Balazs Kelemen
On 04/17/2013 10:27 AM, Nándor Huszka wrote: Hi All, There is an optimization problem related to animations. If we have one out of the visible viewport, it is still animated. (Try to scroll down on http://philbit.com/animatedgiftest.html) In this case it would be good to stop, then continue

Re: [webkit-dev] Global constructors attributes

2013-04-17 Thread Kentaro Hara
Alternatively, we could add [NotEnumerable, Deletable] before each *Constructor attribute in DOMWindow.idl but it seemed easier the patch the generator considering the number of such attributes in DOMWindow. Also, there is a risk of someone adding a new constructor attribute without the