Before i saw any patches landed i would expect the specification to state
exactly what kernel features are allowed and required.
Additionally the specification language of the security section is fairly weak
- 4.2 doesn't say how CORS will be used to achieve security. Presumably WebCL
just wan
> Over the past weeks, some discussion involving WebCL took place in this
> mailing list ([2]), when some concerns were raised, and to which I later on
> tried to address in [3].
I believe your answer in [3] to the security problems posed by WebCL was that a
standards group is working on a secu
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Antonio Gomes wrote:
> At this time, I would like to contribute our WebCL prototype
> implementation [4] to WebKit.org.
>
> Feature would be defined behind a ENABLE(WEBCL) feature flag, and work
> will be tracked onhttps://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115457.
>
Hello.
As discussed before, Khronos has been working on a specification for WebCL,
a JavaScript API that exposes GPUs and multi-core processors for intensive
compute tasks. The latest version of the working draft is available here:
[1].
Over the past weeks, some discussion involving WebCL took pl
I could have sworn I saw someone in another thread post that they were
interested in taking over maintenance of the binding generators (not
necessarily relating to a massive rewrite, just for ongoing maintenance, was my
impression). But I can't find that email at all now.
Does anyone know who I
Hi there,
Due to the move from one office to a another, our network infra-structure
here will be down for the next 3 or 4 days.
I won't be able to keep the github mirror in sync with
git.webkit.orgduring this period, but it will be back to normality
next Monday, May 6th.
Best regards,
Jesus
On Tuesday 30 April 2013, Carlos Garcia Campos wrote:
> El mar, 30-04-2013 a las 09:11 +0200, Allan Sandfeld Jensen escribió:
> > He probably refers to 1.6.3 of WebKitGTK+, the confusion comes from the
> > fact that WebKitGTK+ calls themselves and their library 'WebKit' on
> > Linux with no attempt
Thanks for the follow up, Karen.
- R. Niwa
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 12:19 AM, Karen Shaeffer
wrote:
> Hi Ryosuke,
> I don't have time at the moment. But I remain interested in WebKit and am
> reading the
> emails as much as possible. I am thinking I'll have more time this summer
> for WebKit.
>
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 9:11 AM, Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote:
> He probably refers to 1.6.3 of WebKitGTK+, the confusion comes from the
> fact
> that WebKitGTK+ calls themselves and their library 'WebKit' on Linux with
> no
> attempt of disambiguation.
>
I doubt it. The confusion comes from the f
Hi Ryosuke,
I don't have time at the moment. But I remain interested in WebKit and am
reading the
emails as much as possible. I am thinking I'll have more time this summer for
WebKit.
Thanks for following up. I have given the issue considerable thought. Not
practical for
me at the moment.
enjo
El mar, 30-04-2013 a las 09:11 +0200, Allan Sandfeld Jensen escribió:
> He probably refers to 1.6.3 of WebKitGTK+, the confusion comes from the fact
> that WebKitGTK+ calls themselves and their library 'WebKit' on Linux with no
> attempt of disambiguation.
right :-( but we fixed that already, ou
He probably refers to 1.6.3 of WebKitGTK+, the confusion comes from the fact
that WebKitGTK+ calls themselves and their library 'WebKit' on Linux with no
attempt of disambiguation.
He needs to update though. I think they are at 1.11 and 2.0 now.
`Allan
On Tuesday 30 April 2013, Filip Pizlo wro
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 10:54 PM, Elliott Sprehn wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Anders Carlsson wrote:
>
>>
>> ...
>>
>> +1
>>
>> From what I’ve heard, the Shadow DOM changes have negatively impacted the
>> packability of the DOM code which is unfortunate. I’m all for removing it.
>>
13 matches
Mail list logo
