Yes, I don’t expect much or any spec churn, especially since Opera shipped this
(prefixed) for several years.
Simon
On Aug 26, 2013, at 5:46 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>
> Is the implementation likely to be correct enough that we wouldn't risk
> locking in buggy behavior?
>
> - Maciej
>
Is the implementation likely to be correct enough that we wouldn't risk locking
in buggy behavior?
- Maciej
On Aug 26, 2013, at 4:23 PM, Simon Fraser wrote:
> Support for CSS object-fit has landed in Blink (runtime-enabled)[1] and I’d
> like to land it in WebKit[2].
>
> The spec[3] is at C
Sounds fine to me.
-Sam
On Aug 26, 2013, at 4:23 PM, Simon Fraser wrote:
> Support for CSS object-fit has landed in Blink (runtime-enabled)[1] and I’d
> like to land it in WebKit[2].
>
> The spec[3] is at CR, so I’d like to land this unprefixed, and not protected
> by ENABLE guards. Does any
Support for CSS object-fit has landed in Blink (runtime-enabled)[1] and I’d
like to land it in WebKit[2].
The spec[3] is at CR, so I’d like to land this unprefixed, and not protected by
ENABLE guards. Does anyone see fit to object?
Simon
[1] http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/blink?view=revision&r
4 matches
Mail list logo