Re: [webkit-dev] The SrcN responsive images proposal

2013-11-05 Thread John Mellor
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 10:19 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote: 99 is a very high upper bound while it would still allow us to implement the optimization we're thinking of. I'm of the opinion that we should use exactly one attribute for this feature. The thing is, srcN isn't a list,

Re: [webkit-dev] The SrcN responsive images proposal

2013-11-05 Thread Dirk Schulze
On Nov 5, 2013, at 11:18 AM, John Mellor joh...@chromium.orgmailto:joh...@chromium.org wrote: On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 10:19 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.orgmailto:rn...@webkit.org wrote: 99 is a very high upper bound while it would still allow us to implement the optimization we're thinking

Re: [webkit-dev] The SrcN responsive images proposal

2013-11-05 Thread Timothy Hatcher
On Nov 5, 2013, at 2:18 AM, John Mellor joh...@chromium.org wrote: img srcset=(min-width: 640px) 0.5x ph...@0.5x.jpg, 1x ph...@1x.jpg, 2x ph...@2x.jpg || 0.5x photo-c...@0.5x.jpg, 1x photo-c...@1x.jpg, 2x photo-c...@2x.jpg I prefer this over multiple attributes. It is a syntax that needs