Re: [webkit-dev] Potential problem with member function pointer sizes

2016-04-13 Thread Isaac Devine
Hi Chris, I wonder whether what you have reported would cause this issue: https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151162 Cheers, Isaac On 14 April 2016 at 09:17, Vienneau, Christopher wrote: > Hi, > > > > I just wanted to give a heads up on an issue I recently investigated, the > details can b

[webkit-dev] Potential problem with member function pointer sizes

2016-04-13 Thread Vienneau, Christopher
Hi, I just wanted to give a heads up on an issue I recently investigated, the details can be seen in this forums post: https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/vstudio/en-US/72343dd4-3a43-46e8-889e-73dc4d8e9432/discrepancy-with-sizeof-in-template?forum=vcgeneral The short version is that the MSVC

Re: [webkit-dev] BigO correlation tests

2016-04-13 Thread Darin Adler
> On Apr 13, 2016, at 12:18 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote: > > I think Darin likes these tests. I love the idea of them and I’d like to see us write more. Changing our algorithms to be efficient for large data sets is a tricky problem and an easy way to write a test that cleanly checks for that is qu

Re: [webkit-dev] BigO correlation tests

2016-04-13 Thread Ryosuke Niwa
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 12:17 AM, Nikos Andronikos wrote: > >> >> However, what you proposed will only reduce the likelihood of type I errors >> (false positives). You should also examine how it affects the likelihood of >> type II errors (false negative). You might want to make some API >> a

Re: [webkit-dev] BigO correlation tests

2016-04-13 Thread Nikos Andronikos
> On 13 Apr 2016, at 4:22 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote: > > I don’t think order of magnitudes tests ever quite worked JSC (it was added > by Google so it obviously worked on V8). If adjusting the threshold was all > that was needed to make the tests pass, I see no reason how to change it. Adjusting