Re: [webkit-dev] WebKit GObject bindings: Who is guiding their future?

El mar, 30-08-2016 a las 09:52 -0700, Darin Adler escribió: > Thanks for the frank discussion, guys. > > I do think we may be able to make the GObject bindings better and > better over time even if they are hand written rather than generated. Exactly. > I understand that you want to keep them

Re: [webkit-dev] WebKit GObject bindings: Who is guiding their future?

Thanks for the frank discussion, guys. I do think we may be able to make the GObject bindings better and better over time even if they are hand written rather than generated. I understand that you want to keep them vital and up to date in a way that the Apple folks are not planning to do for

Re: [webkit-dev] WebKit GObject bindings: Who is guiding their future?

El mar, 30-08-2016 a las 06:10 -0500, Michael Catanzaro escribió: > I'm OK with freezing the bindings. I'm disappointed in that these are > a > killer feature for us and they'll never get improved now, but > generating them seems to be causing too many problems that we cannot > easily solve. why

Re: [webkit-dev] WebKit GObject bindings: Who is guiding their future?

I'm OK with freezing the bindings. I'm disappointed in that these are a killer feature for us and they'll never get improved now, but generating them seems to be causing too many problems that we cannot easily solve. On Tue, 2016-08-30 at 08:54 +0200, Carlos Garcia Campos wrote: > haha, no, of

Re: [webkit-dev] WebKit GObject bindings: Who is guiding their future?

El lun, 29-08-2016 a las 10:01 -0700, Darin Adler escribió: > > On Aug 29, 2016, at 1:16 AM, Carlos Garcia Campos > org> wrote: > > > > Does that mean than from the WebIDL point of view all methods can > > now > > raise a exception? If don't tell the code generator that a