Re: [webkit-dev] Another WPT bite

> On May 13, 2017, at 5:26 PM, Michael[tm] Smith wrote: > > Maciej Stachowiak , 2017-05-13 14:58 -0700: >> ... From what I gather, there are a lot of tests where only the paths to >> the test harness end up requiring the server. > > Yeah that’s the case for the vast majority of tests. Relative

Re: [webkit-dev] Another WPT bite

Anne van Kesteren , 2017-05-13 06:20 +0200: > > On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 11:49 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: > > It seems like there's two unusual things about WPT: > > - At least according to Alexey, WPT tests are somewhat prone to flakiness > > in Safari. > > Although they haven't always been w

Re: [webkit-dev] Another WPT bite

Brady Eidson , 2017-05-13 17:11 -0700: > > > > On May 12, 2017, at 7:43 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote: > > > > On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 7:31 PM, Alexey Proskuryakov > > wrote: > >> > >> When there is a test failure that I need to communicate to others, I say > >> something "please open > >>

Re: [webkit-dev] Another WPT bite

Maciej Stachowiak , 2017-05-13 14:58 -0700: > ... From what I gather, there are a lot of tests where only the paths to > the test harness end up requiring the server. Yeah that’s the case for the vast majority of tests. Relatively few — less than 5% altogether, I’d estimate — actually rely on any

Re: [webkit-dev] Another WPT bite

> On May 12, 2017, at 7:43 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote: > > On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 7:31 PM, Alexey Proskuryakov wrote: >> >> When there is a test failure that I need to communicate to others, I say >> something "please open >>

Re: [webkit-dev] Another WPT bite

> On May 12, 2017, at 7:49 PM, a...@webkit.org wrote: > > >> 12 мая 2017 г., в 19:38, Brian Burg > > написал(а): >> >>> I think that I explained it very clearly, but let me try again. >>> >>> When there is a test failure that I need to communicate to others, I say >>>