On Mon, Feb 12, 2018, at 6:43 PM, youenn fablet wrote:
> Hi Zan,
>
> I like the idea of using WebDriver for WPT conformance testing.
> Such results will probably be more meaningful for conformance than what WTR
> or DRT could produce.
> For WPT regression testing, we would stick to using WTR/DRT
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018, at 6:26 PM, Brian Burg wrote:
> Hi Zan!
>
>> On Feb 12, 2018, at 7:06 AM, z...@falconsigh.net wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> the web-platform-tests repository includes tooling that enables running
>> those tests against a supported browser product. I'd like to propose adding
>> g
Hi Zan,
I like the idea of using WebDriver for WPT conformance testing.
Such results will probably be more meaningful for conformance than what WTR
or DRT could produce.
For WPT regression testing, we would stick to using WTR/DRT and internals
methods instead of WebDriver, am I right?
y
Le lun
Hi Zan!
> On Feb 12, 2018, at 7:06 AM, z...@falconsigh.net wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> the web-platform-tests repository includes tooling that enables running those
> tests against a supported browser product. I'd like to propose adding generic
> WebKit support there.
>
>
> Current changes only assum
Hi,
the web-platform-tests repository includes tooling that enables running those
tests against a supported browser product. I'd like to propose adding generic
WebKit support there.
Current changes only assume usage of the WebDriver protocol, and the WebDriver
binary accepting the --port flag
5 matches
Mail list logo