On Friday 2019-09-27 14:23 +0200, Emilio Cobos Álvarez wrote:
> Does anyone have strong opinions against removing scroll anchoring from
> Gecko, based on the above?
It seems pretty sad, since I think it's a very useful feature for a
large class of pages -- particularly pages that are more "documen
On Sunday 2019-09-29 10:54 +1000, Cameron McCormack wrote:
> How useful is scroll anchoring outside of the two cases mentioned in
> https://drafts.csswg.org/css-scroll-anchoring/#intro i.e. images loading and
> ad iframes being inserted? Would it be feasible to make scroll anchoring a
> much le
Hi Steve,
On 9/27/19 4:03 PM, Steve Kobes wrote:
Hi Emilio,
My recollection is that scroll anchoring was, in fact, a mess. I do not
personally have any opinion about whether scroll anchoring should be
removed from Gecko.
We (Chrome) decided to accept some compat issues for the sake of
lau
On 9/29/19 5:07 AM, Rick Byers wrote:
On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 10:16 AM Emilio Cobos Álvarez
mailto:emi...@mozilla.com>> wrote:
Hi Steve,
On 9/27/19 4:03 PM, Steve Kobes wrote:
> Hi Emilio,
>
> My recollection is that scroll anchoring was, in fact, a mess. I
do not
> On Sep 27, 2019, at 10:08 PM, Emilio Cobos Álvarez wrote:
>
> And, to be clear, we _can_ fix these compat issues, some way or another.
>
> One thought is to limit the amount of scroll adjustments without user
> scrolling or stuff like that, which would prevent the "you get stuck on the
> pa
This queue is back in good state. Please let me know if you notice any issue.
Thanks
Aakash
> On Sep 27, 2019, at 9:21 PM, Aakash Jain wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Last week we updated the iOS bots from iOS 12 to iOS 13. Since then we have
> been noticing a lot of flaky tests. Because of that ios-
6 matches
Mail list logo
