this is kind of what 'bind' is for, no?
it's a little wordy, but you can just pass:
console.log.bind(console)
instead of the closure.
its been around quite a while:
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Function/bind
personally as a web dev, it would frus
27;s particular libraries we want to use which have different
> conventions, the adaptation should be done at the level of interfacing the
> library. Changing WebKit's conventiones because of one optional dependency
> does not make sense to me.
>
> Regards,
> Maciej
>
>
end on SerializedScriptValue's current method signatures?
Alec
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Benjamin Poulain
wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 4:54 PM, Alec Flett wrote:
>
>> Well, nobody is explicitly using LChar with SerializedScriptValue (maybe
>> it should, maybe that
why LevelDB
uses it as its lowest-common-denominator, but we don't have to have that
debate here :))
Alec
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Benjamin Poulain wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Alec Flett wrote:
>
>> At the moment, SerializedScriptValue uses Vector (aka
>> Vec
At the moment, SerializedScriptValue uses Vector (aka
Vector) for both it's API (createFromWireBytes, toWireBytes)
as well as its internal representation. (for both v8 and jsc
implementations)
The two largest consumers of this aspect of SerializedScriptValue seems to
be IndexedDB and postMessage()
So this thread kinda died. Anyone have any suggestions? Where is JSC's
SerializedScriptValue consistency tested?
Alec
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Alec Flett wrote:
> Sorry I totally left out the "I expose this through Internals" - and adam
> has explained the rationa
Sorry I totally left out the "I expose this through Internals" - and adam
has explained the rationale
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 12:46 PM, Oliver Hunt wrote:
> What exactly are you trying to test here? The internal serialisation
> format isn't exposed anywhere (nor should it be).
>
> By definition
Background: some of the storage systems use SerializedScriptValue to
persist structured-clonable objects (
http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/common-dom-interfaces.html#safe-passing-of-structured-data)
- most of this is implemented in a V8 or JSC-specific implementation of
SerializedScriptValue.
I'm addin
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 5:57 AM, Stephen Chenney wrote:
>
>> I don't doubt there are poor comments, both outdated and useless.
>> That's a reviewing failure. You have simply highlighted the fact that any
>> standard for comments requires re
I'm gonna chime in here, as I am 3 months into working on WebKit and the
lack of comments has driven me absolutely crazy. This is a bit of a rant
from a self-declared newbie, but I'm trying to be constructive. I've
contributed to a handful of open and closed source projects. I am trying to
help,
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 4:42 AM, 김지연 wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> ** **
>
> This is Jiyeon Kim recently joined webkit-dev mailing list.
>
> **
>
Welcome - I'm somewhat new here myself, but I am working on IndexedDB
support in WebKit..
**
>
> I’ve got two questions on IndexedDB.
>
> First, I
11 matches
Mail list logo
