Hi Adam,
On 10.5.2012, at 14.20, ext Anssi Kostiainen wrote:
On 9.5.2012, at 23.22, ext Adam Barth wrote:
Thanks. I just have two pieces of feedback:
1) As far as I know, we don't have any plans to implement the WebIDL
interfaces.
2) From the spec, it sounds like the capture
On 9.5.2012, at 23.22, ext Adam Barth wrote:
Thanks. I just have two pieces of feedback:
1) As far as I know, we don't have any plans to implement the WebIDL
interfaces.
2) From the spec, it sounds like the capture attribute is limited to
only known values (see
Hi Tamura, Adam,
On 9.5.2012, at 11.44, ext TAMURA, Kent wrote:
I wonder if the standardization is active. Even the editor's draft has not
been updated for one year.
Good that you ask -- the spec has been waiting for implementors' feedback :)
If you're able to send us feedback based on
Hi,
On 16.6.2011, at 19.02, ext Darin Fisher wrote:
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 5:12 AM, Anssi Kostiainen
anssi.kostiai...@nokia.com wrote:
On 15.6.2011, at 21.29, ext Darin Fisher wrote:
There should probably be a way to poll the current state. Much as you can
poll
Hi,
On 15.6.2011, at 20.25, ext Greg Simon wrote:
From what I can tell the spec offers no way for the web application to
initialize any algorithm based on the battery/power state because there is no
guarantee of minimum time when a new document is created and the first
battery event
Hi,
On 15.6.2011, at 17.24, ext Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
2011/6/15 권기홍 kihong.k...@samsung.com
I wanted to let you know that I plan to add battery status event support to
WebCore.
The Battery Status Event is a new feature that is defined by W3C
(http://www.w3.org/TR/battery-status)
It
6 matches
Mail list logo
