2251 [main] svn 15008 open_stackdumpfile: Dumping stack trace to
> > svn.exe.stackdump
> > 0 [main] svn 14496 exception::handle: Exception:
> > STATUS_ACCESS_VIOLATION
> >1796 [main] svn 14496 open_stackdumpfile: Dumping stack trace to
> > svn.exe.stackdum
ndle: Exception:
STATUS_ACCESS_VIOLATION
1796 [main] svn 14496 open_stackdumpfile: Dumping stack trace to
svn.exe.stackdump
exec of 'diff' failed: Bad addresssvn: 'diff' returned 255
Extracting affected function names from source files.
Change author: John Abd-El-Malek .
Runni
, 2009 at 1:50 PM, John Abd-El-Malek wrote:
>>
>>> Does this argue for making the image loading trick work all the time from
>>> JS, not just from unload handlers? I tested with IE and it looks like the
>>> image trick works all the time, not just in unload handle
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 12:31 AM, Darin Fisher wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 7:53 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>
>>
>> On Oct 14, 2009, at 6:43 PM, John Abd-El-Malek wrote:
>>
>> To resurrect this thread. I'm looking in implementing some of the
>&g
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 7:53 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>
> On Oct 14, 2009, at 6:43 PM, John Abd-El-Malek wrote:
>
> To resurrect this thread. I'm looking in implementing some of the methods
>> that we discussed so that web developers have no excuse in simulat
uires JavaScript, I think this is acceptable since the
problem sites now already use JavaScript to simulate sleeps and fetch the
image, so we're not placing more requirements on them.
Do we have agreement on proceeding with implementing the Image based
approach?
Thanks,
John
On Thu, Sep 17, 200
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 4:08 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>
> On Sep 17, 2009, at 2:16 PM, John Abd-El-Malek wrote:
>
>
>>
>> I think the image trick is more attractive than because it's
>> easier for web developers to use. But I'm not convinced it'
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 12:14 PM, Darin Fisher wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 2:28 AM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>
>>
>> On Sep 17, 2009, at 12:35 AM, Darin Fisher wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>> For to be used as I suggested, you would need to set the href to
>>> a javascript URL such as javascript:
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Darin Fisher wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 12:52 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>
>>
>> On Sep 17, 2009, at 12:14 PM, Darin Fisher wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 2:28 AM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Sep 17, 2009, at 12:35 AM, Darin Fi
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 11:03 PM, Darin Fisher wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 10:57 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>
>>
>> On Sep 16, 2009, at 10:33 PM, Darin Fisher wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 9:59 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Sep 16, 2009, at 4:49 PM, Darin Fisher
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>
> On Sep 16, 2009, at 11:23 AM, Geoffrey Garen wrote:
>
> Given some of our (Chromium-team) recent investigation into the contents
>>> of unload handlers, I'm not sure how much this move will help users, even if
>>> you don't revert it.
.
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 12:52 AM, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 18:18 -0700, John Abd-El-Malek wrote:
> > this changelist. Operations such as "gcl upload CHANGENAME" (upload
> > to Rietveld) work on the group of files at the same time (also t
sure I understand what
> a "changelist" is in this context and how bugzilla-tool would support them.
>
> Dave
>
>
>
> *From:* John Abd-El-Malek
> *To:* Ojan Vafai
> *Cc:* WebKit Development ; Mark Rowe <
> mr...@apple.com>
> *Sent:* Friday, July 10,
To add another tangent to this thread: one thing I don't like about
ChangeLog files is that they make it impossible to have multiple concurrent
changes in the same checkout. Yes I know that some people use git to get
around this, while others use the svn-apply/svn-unapply scripts. But I feel
thes
Thanks for the info guys, I stand corrected. Completely forgot about the JS
issue.
2009/6/15 Oliver Hunt
> This is not possible due to various issues with the interaction between JS
> across multiple webviews, and the additional assumption that all layout and
> painting occurs in the UI thread.
Yes it's possible. The Chromium port runs web views in different processes.
You can look at the design docs and source to see how it's done, that
should give you an idea of what you have to do this on different threads.
2009/6/15 熊科浪
>
> hi
> I want to develop c++ application that uses Web
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 8:12 AM, Joe Mason wrote:
> Mark Rowe wrote:
>
>> - UI is intimidating to newcomers. This is clearly subjective, but since
>> the goal here is to make the review process friendlier, especially for new
>> contributors, I think it deserves calling out.
>>
> FWIW, after playi
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 5:15 PM, Eric Seidel wrote:
> At least one person has tried to tie review-board with bugzilla:
>
> http://www.visophyte.org/blog/2009/03/20/using-review-board-for-bugzilla-request-queues-reviews/
>
> I expect that we'd have to hack review board to do bugzilla-based
> authen
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 12:00 AM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
> On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 9:40 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>
>>
>> On May 26, 2009, at 6:11 PM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Did you say partly because it's more complicated than just splitting one
>>> class (and only having 1-way sync comm
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 5:31 PM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
> On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 5:21 PM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
>
>> On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Sam Weinig wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
>>>
The common case is definitely that we know whether we want the
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 5:00 PM, Sam Weinig wrote:
> On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 11:08 AM, John Abd-El-Malek wrote:
>
>> I agree that this approach is powerful. However there are (not too
>> frequent) situations when a port like Chromium wants to use both the WebKit
>> im
I agree that this approach is powerful. However there are (not too
frequent) situations when a port like Chromium wants to use both the WebKit
implementation and its own implementation, switching in runtime. For
workers, this happened with WorkerContextProxy/WorkerObjectProxy which are
the interf
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 2:50 PM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 2:25 PM, Drew Wilson wrote:
>
>> Following up on this, I had a question about the best way to enable the
>> implementation of SharedWorkerRepository to vary for different platforms.
>> I'd like to provide a default We
23 matches
Mail list logo
