Is it possible for a "false positive" on the stack to prevent an object from
being collected even after calling collect() multiple times?
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 9:45 AM, Maciej Stachowiak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sep 11, 2008, at 1:53 AM, Josh Chia (谢任中) wrote:
&g
Sep 11, 2008 at 1:33 AM, Maciej Stachowiak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sep 11, 2008, at 12:13 AM, Josh Chia (谢任中) wrote:
>
> I did some more research. It seems that KJS does mark-and-sweep
> GC<http://www.hpl.hp.com/personal/Hans_Boehm/gc/complexity.html>,
&g
wrong.
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 9:23 PM, Josh Chia (谢任中) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to debug some memory leaks and now need to understand what
> collector.{h,cpp} are doing. Could someone point me to some documents to
> explain how the garbage collect
Hi,
I'm trying to debug some memory leaks and now need to understand what
collector.{h,cpp} are doing. Could someone point me to some documents to
explain how the garbage collector works? I've also run valgrind and it
complained that CollectorBitmap::get() uses an unreferenced value. I'm not
su
I have an network platform implementation (ResourceHandle) that I'm not sure
is doing the right thing.
In particular, a.html has a
Hi,
After rendering about 200 pages on my platform port of WebKit, I seem to be
seeing some memory leaks involving the code in KJS, totalling 30-70MB. I
have included a subgraph of the call graph for the leaking functions. I'm
not familiar with the KJS code. Is it possible that circular referen
6 matches
Mail list logo
