[webkit-dev] Proposed feature: Secure Payment Confirmation

Hi WebKit! I'm sending this according to the policy to discuss new feature proposals on webkit-dev . We, the Google Chrome team, are exploring the possibility of shipping the W3C Secure Payment Confirmation API

Re: [webkit-dev] [blink-dev] Re: What to do about scroll anchoring?

> On 9/28/19 10:07 PM, Rick Byers wrote: > > Can you give us a week or so to chat about this within the Chrome team > > and get back to you? > > Any updates here? > > Thanks. > > -- > Mike Taylor > Web Compat, Mozilla > __

Re: [webkit-dev] Another WPT bite

On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 4:54 AM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: > > > > On May 16, 2017, at 1:16 AM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote: > > > > On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 11:57 PM, Anne van Kesteren > wrote: > >> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 7:29 AM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote: > >>> Given we're talking about how these tests are

Re: [webkit-dev] Another WPT bite

On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 2:43 PM, youenn fablet wrote: > > Le ven. 12 mai 2017 à 11:07, Alexey Proskuryakov a écrit : > >> >> 9 мая 2017 г., в 11:27, Simon Fraser написал(а): >> >> >> Another consideration here is "would my test be useful for other browser >> vendors". I don't think the answer i

Re: [webkit-dev] Another WPT bite

On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 2:06 PM, Alexey Proskuryakov wrote: > > 9 мая 2017 г., в 11:27, Simon Fraser написал(а): > > Another consideration here is "would my test be useful for other browser > vendors". I don't think the answer is a unanimous "yes", so I think we > should only use WPT for tests t

Re: [webkit-dev] Implementing Universal Second Factor (U2F)

> > On Feb 22, 2017, at 1:22 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 12:56 PM, Rick Byers wrote: > >> Chrome ships with a built-in extension that exposes the high-level API >> (which I think we all agree is a hack). We recently had this discussion >>

Re: [webkit-dev] Implementing Universal Second Factor (U2F)

Chrome ships with a built-in extension that exposes the high-level API (which I think we all agree is a hack). We recently had this discussion about the right path forward here, and agreed that we should instead fo

Re: [webkit-dev] PSA: higher precision event timestamp landing soon - port verification needed

On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Benjamin Poulain wrote: > On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 7:37 AM, Rick Byers wrote: > >> There's been discussion / patches in the past for exposing system time as >> a separate timestamp on the Event object (as IE does). See >> https://list

Re: [webkit-dev] PSA: higher precision event timestamp landing soon - port verification needed

There's been discussion / patches in the past for exposing system time as a separate timestamp on the Event object (as IE does). See https://lists.webkit.org/pipermail/webkit-dev/2012-October/022574.html, https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94987 and http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-

Re: [webkit-dev] Unprefixed and prefixed DOM events.

On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 9:56 AM, Alexis Menard wrote: > On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Rick Byers wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 6:19 AM, Alexis Menard > wrote: > >> > >> On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 8:42 PM, Rick Byers > wrote: > >> > I've

Re: [webkit-dev] Unprefixed and prefixed DOM events.

On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 6:19 AM, Alexis Menard wrote: > On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 8:42 PM, Rick Byers wrote: > > I've been wondering about the implications of prefixed events. Do we > have > > other examples of events that had prefixed names and were later > unprefixe

Re: [webkit-dev] Unprefixed and prefixed DOM events.

I've been wondering about the implications of prefixed events. Do we have other examples of events that had prefixed names and were later unprefixed? In particular, what are the composition implications of your solution? When you say "depending if someone is listening to it or not" you mean whet

Re: [webkit-dev] Possible device scale factor emulation approaches?

On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Alexander Pavlov wrote: > On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 7:30 PM, Rick Byers wrote: > >> On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 3:53 AM, Alexander Pavlov wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Adam Barth wrote: >>> >>>> O

Re: [webkit-dev] Possible device scale factor emulation approaches?

On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 3:53 AM, Alexander Pavlov wrote: > On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Adam Barth wrote: > >> On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 10:44 PM, Alexander Pavlov >> wrote: >> > On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 5:36 AM, Dana Jansens >> wrote: >> >> On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 8:28 PM, Adam Barth wrote: >> >

Re: [webkit-dev] pointer events specification - first editors draft

On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Benjamin Poulain wrote: > On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 10:34 AM, Rick Byers wrote: >> >> >> The premise of the specification is that using mouse event and touch >> >> events >> >> interchangeably is needed. In rea

Re: [webkit-dev] pointer events specification - first editors draft

e on touch events. What options do we have for moving touch input forward on the open web? Rick On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 3:17 AM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: > > > On Nov 28, 2012, at 8:23 AM, Adam Barth wrote: > > > It looks like this thread got dropped over Thanksgiving. (

[webkit-dev] pointer events specification - first editors draft

Hi, The W3C pointer events working group [1] has put out their first editors draft of the Pointer Events specification [2]. Pointer events offer a number of advantages over the current mouse event + touch event model in WebKit. In particular, having apps state clearly and declaratively [3] whethe

[webkit-dev] Enabling support for high-dpi custom mouse cursors

One of the few places WebKit still doesn't support high-DPI images is custom 'cursor' CSS rules. I brought this up on www-style awhile back [1] and the consensus was that using image-set was the preferred mechanism. The CSS4 images draft spec now specifies that cursor can take any [2], including

[webkit-dev] Adding new CSS (pointer) and (hover) media features to WebCore

Hi Webkit-dev, I just wanted to let you know that I'm about to add initial support ( https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87403) for two new minor CSS media query features: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css4-mediaqueries/#pointer http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css4-mediaqueries/#hover Ports can opt into thi