> I also got a little inspiration from the
> import-w3c-performance-wg-tests that already exists. I followed a few of
> their steps, but had to add a few layers to handle the added complexity of
> the CSS test suites.
Is there any way we can merge the two scripts so there is only one
import/export
> Does it matter if the page contents are bad/incomplete?
Good point. Seems fine for any given page to be incomplete is a
specific way. The only thing that would concern me is if we always
miss a certain class of resources. For instance, if we never recorded
resources fetched via XHR, it could lea
While it'd require some archaeology, would it be useful to compile a list
of formerly prefixed APIs which have graduated?
-Tony
On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 2:10 AM, Adam Barth wrote:
> As you might be aware, there's been some amount of debate in the
> browser community recently about the use of vend
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 2:14 AM, Aaron Boodman wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Peter Kasting wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Balazs Kelemen wrote:
>>>
>>> As the goal is to test "real world" use case I think it can be even better
>>> to simply load the sites from network.
> The e-mail notification for CC field changes is (among others) configurable
> in everyone's Bugzilla preferences. By default, only bug originator and
> assignee get an e-mail for that.
>
> I think that originators generally appreciate any kind of activity on their
> bugs, even as small as some
Hopefully not too off-topic, but along lines of bugs UI housekeeping...
I'd like a way to CC myself on a bug without spamming everyone on the
bug. Some other bug trackers offer a checkbox that can disable email
update. Would anyone else find something like that useful?
-Tony
_
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 8:14 AM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>
> On May 23, 2011, at 8:16 AM, Patrick Mueller wrote:
>
> > On 5/20/11 12:46 PM, Alexey Proskuryakov wrote:
> >> What incentive will users have to enable it? For other privacy sensitive
> >> features (be it cookies or geolocation), there
;
> On May 20, 2011, at 10:10 AM, Tony Gentilcore wrote:
>
>>> Presumably the embedding application would need to require explicit user
>>> consent to enable the feature.
>>
>> My conclusion was different. Given that the timing based privacy
>> attac
> Presumably the embedding application would need to require explicit user
> consent to enable the feature.
My conclusion was different. Given that the timing based privacy
attacks are demonstrable without the interface, I thought it
reasonable to enable-by-default with a hidden pref to disable.
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 3:17 AM, Simon Fraser wrote:
> Seem like this new web-facing API would provide more data for sites wanting
> to do user fingerprinting, even when cookies etc. are disabled.
>
Good point. To my knowledge this is the most thorough explanation of the
issue:
http://sip.cs.prin
For those interested, the cover bug for this work is here:
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56459
-Tony
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 8:27 AM, Adam Bergkvist wrote:
> I want to inform people on this list that we have been doing some early
> implementation work of the video conferencing and pee
I was sad not to be able to attend the contributors meeting. Did
anyone happen to take any notes?
-Tony
___
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
> Sorry to resurrect this old thread
I presume you resurrected for other reasons, but I'll take the
opportunity to give a brief update. The API is now implemented as a V8
extension in Chromium and documented here:
http://dev.chromium.org/searchbox
___
we
Your test case isn't really about prioritization. The HTML5 spec
defines very specifically when parsing must stop. The two main cases
are:
1. Waiting for an external script to download
2. Waiting for an external stylesheet to download when any script
block is reached
In these cases, the parser doe
e meantime, there is:
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48423
> -eric
>
> On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 3:56 PM, Tony Gentilcore
> wrote:
> > Quick PSA: if you install the "Java for Mac OS X 10.6 Update 3" system
> > update you may start getting build errors like:
&
Quick PSA: if you install the "Java for Mac OS X 10.6 Update 3" system
update you may start getting build errors like:
error: JavaVM/jni.h: No such file or directory
The solution is to install "Java for Mac OS X 10.6 Update 3 Developer
Package" from http://connect.apple.com > Downloads > Java [1].
s sounds like Browser-exposed DOM API. Not
>> something that WebKit has any business adding.
>>
>> -eric
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 10:10 AM, Darin Adler wrote:
>> > On Oct 15, 2010, at 10:00 AM, Tony Gentilcore wrote:
>> >
>>
Hi All,
We are working on adding instant search integration to Chrome. This requires
a DOM API which only the default search provider has permission to
access. As some of you may have seen, earlier this week I sent a proposal
for such an API to the WHATWG [1].
Is this something that other ports m
On Oct 4, 2010, at 11:31 AM, Tony Gentilcore wrote:
>
>> If you subclass RefCounted or Noncopyable, which is very common, you pick
>> up FastAllocBase.
>
> Yes, so in those cases you don’t want to use it.
>
>> So, my naive guess is that any class/struct which doesn&#
For general reference, when is it appropriate to use FastAllocBase?
If you subclass RefCounted or Noncopyable, which is very common,
you pick up FastAllocBase. So, my naive guess is that any class/struct
which doesn't pick up FastAllocBase through its inheritance chain
should subclass it directly.
Just a thought. Would it be too aggressive/premature to add a style rule
requiring the Xcode 3.2.3+ behavior? That would unfortunately mean that
users of older versions would have to manually edit the file to keep the
style checker happy.
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 11:28 AM, Darin Adler wrote:
> It
Looks like the slave is back now.
But there are ~90 pending builds:
http://build.webkit.org/builders/Leopard%20Intel%20Release%20(Tests)
For future reference, I'm curious if it is safe to cancel some older builds
so that it will catch up.
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 11:37 AM, Eric Seidel wrote:
> h
The Surfin' Safari blog seems to have fairly wide readership in the web dev
community. Google Reader reports 35k Reader subscribers. For comparison:
blog.chromium.org has 17k and blog.mozilla.com has 10k. However, the last
post with descriptive content was back on April 18th. Since that post, we've
No theories. But another data point; Tiger started doing the same a few
revisions earlier:
/Volumes/Data/WebKit-BuildSlave/tiger-intel-release/build/WebKit/mac/WebView/WebView.mm:
In function 'void -[WebView(WebPrivate)
_commonInitializationWithFrameName:groupName:usesDocumentViews:](WebView*,
obj
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 7:22 PM, James Robinson wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 7:19 PM, Oliver Hunt wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jul 7, 2010, at 7:16 PM, Tony Gentilcore wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 6:50 PM, Mo, Zhenyao wrote:
>>
&
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 6:50 PM, Mo, Zhenyao wrote:
> Maybe I should complain this in a different threads, but recently the
> commit bot waiting time is way too long. Several times a patch of mine got
> the r+ and cq+ and it landed two days later. This is really frustrating.
>
> I am very tempte
Is there any policy or guideline regarding when it is appropriate to use the
commit queue vs landing directly?
I feel like there is an unfortunate "positive feedback" loop right now:
1. Commit queue gets slightly backed up either due to a breakage or just
heavy volume.
2. Because the queue is back
There's an excellent doc on some of WTF's smart pointers:
http://webkit.org/coding/RefPtr.html
I'm interested to hear if there are any other references out there too.
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 7:45 PM, Eric Zhou wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Could anyone give me some references about WTF, like tutorials or
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 1:07 PM, Eric Seidel wrote:
> Is this caused by the base load address of both perl and svn
> conflicting/overlapping? (I don't really know how CYGWIN works.)
>
I'm by no means a cygwin expert. I just happened to run into the same
problem last week.
This thread is where
I'm just in the process of converting to git, but this looks amazing!
It would be really helpful for me if
http://trac.webkit.org/wiki/UsingGitWithWebKit had a section that explains
the flow for using webkit-patch with git.
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 1:20 PM, Kenneth Christiansen <
kenneth.christian
I'm new to WebKit, so apologies in advance for my ignorance.
There is a chromium bug that we don't update the spelling markers when spell
checking is toggled or the language is changed (http://crbug.com/21225).
I have a fix ready for this which simply re-checks the field upon toggle.
But this ste
31 matches
Mail list logo
