On Feb 15, 2007, at 9:13 AM, Jean-Charles VERDIE wrote:
Maciej Stachowiak a écrit :
The platform/ directory is already supposed to be a browser
abstraction layer. I'm not sure why a second layer of abstraction
would be necessary. Anything additional that needs to be
abstracted should just
Maciej Stachowiak a écrit :
The platform/ directory is already supposed to be a browser
abstraction layer. I'm not sure why a second layer of abstraction
would be necessary. Anything additional that needs to be abstracted
should just be added as new WebCore/platform or JavaScriptCore/wtf
class
On Feb 15, 2007, at 3:42 AM, Jean-Charles VERDIE wrote:
wtk32 a écrit :
Hi Jean-Charles
It's really interesting since our refactoring is based upon a
clear split between what is really (from our point of view)
WebKit, and what is platform+OS dependent (font engine, graphic
context, thre
wtk32 a écrit :
Hi Jean-Charles
It's really interesting since our refactoring is based upon a clear
split between what is really (from our point of view) WebKit, and
what is platform+OS dependent (font engine, graphic context, threads,
and so on).
This sounds most interesting. Will the resu
It is. It is even close to be build-botted :)
I can have it sent to you, but as I said, for the moment, it's really
focused on the changes we made, but we can start talking about it since
our goal is to have our changes integrated to the TOT when we're ready
to propose it.
BTW, CMake is real
Hi.
I'm also very interesting in switching from bakefiles to cmake. As you
said, having a single build system for the ports makes more easier to
maintain it.
Is your cmake build system already done? If true, I'd like to use it
with the webkit TOT to compile the gdk port.
Regards.
El Xov, 15-02
Hi
For our WebKit customization, we first used Bakefile from the original
gtk port.
The issue with it was that it was impossible (or we didn't figure how)
to make a .so and a .a from the same sources and on the same target.
We dropped it to switch to CMake which we find very interesting for o
That's a great idea. I was planning to go this way as well, just
didn't get far enough in understanding how those scripts work.
-- kjk
On 2/14/07, Kevin Ollivier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Krzysztof,
This is what I'm doing right now with the wx port (I have a ./build-
wxwebkit script), and
Hi Krzysztof,
This is what I'm doing right now with the wx port (I have a ./build-
wxwebkit script), and it's working pretty well for me. I'm building
using make/gcc on Unix and Mac, and using MSVS 2005 on Win. The other
benefit of a script is that you can integrate all the steps (e.g.
reg
Current svn gdk build works. Here's a script I use to do a full build:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/src/webkit-tot$ more ./gdk-rebuild.sh
#!/bin/sh
pushd .
cd WebKitTools/Scripts
./regenerate-makefiles
cd ../../JavaScriptCore
make clean
make
cd ../WebCore/Projects/gdk
make clean
make .DerivedSources
make
Rich,
The build instructions haven't changed for the Gdk port since that
wiki page was written. Please note that the instructions say:
"The port is not fully-maintained, but contributors often provide
changes to keep it in sync with the rest of WebKit. This means that
it may not always be
Thanks Mark,
Alas, I fear I have have tried everything I can think of. I'm doing this in
a fresh parallels ubuntu.
1. Installed ubuntu.
2. Installed gcc
3. Installed svn
4. Installed the missing python pieces
5. Installed the bakefile version linked to in the readme.
6. Followed the instructions
Rich,
Please take a look at the wiki page with instructions: trac.webkit.org/projects/webkit/wiki/BuildingGdk>.
Kind regards,
Mark Rowe
On 12/02/2007, at 6:36 AM, Rich Curtis wrote:
Hi WebKit Devs,
Are there any instructions anywhere on how to build WebKit for Linux?
I'm running ubuntu 6.1
Hi WebKit Devs,
Are there any instructions anywhere on how to build WebKit for Linux?
I'm running ubuntu 6.10.1 and got bakefile installed ok, but when I run make
in any of the project dirs it goes looking for xcodebuild which I'm pretty
sure is a Mac OS X utility. Am I missing some crucial step?
14 matches
Mail list logo
