Re: [webkit-dev] CSS3 Paged Media module

2012-03-08 Thread Seo Sanghyeon
2012/3/8, David Hyatt : > That page should be updated. We don't have that architectural flaw any > longer since I re-wrote pagination last year. Please do so! -- Seo Sanghyeon ___ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.

Re: [webkit-dev] CSS3 Paged Media module

2012-03-07 Thread David Hyatt
That page should be updated. We don't have that architectural flaw any longer since I re-wrote pagination last year. dave (hy...@apple.com) On Mar 7, 2012, at 8:27 AM, Seo Sanghyeon wrote: > 2012/3/7, Milian Wolff : >> Ping? Could someone be so kind as to answer my questions below? > > As the

Re: [webkit-dev] CSS3 Paged Media module

2012-03-07 Thread Seo Sanghyeon
2012/3/7, Milian Wolff : > Ping? Could someone be so kind as to answer my questions below? As the following page admits, WebKit's printing architecture has "the big flaw" and in general inferior to Gecko and other engines. I fear you may have to rework most of WebKit's printing code to do what you

Re: [webkit-dev] CSS3 Paged Media module

2012-03-06 Thread Benjamin Poulain
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 4:50 AM, Milian Wolff wrote: > I wonder, has anyone begun working on this? If not, I am willing to give it a > shot. I realize that this is a big task, and it will probably be hard for a > newcomer like me to do properly. Hence take this email also as a cry for help. > Any h

Re: [webkit-dev] CSS3 Paged Media module

2012-03-06 Thread Milian Wolff
On Wednesday 08 February 2012 13:50:54 Milian Wolff wrote: > Hello! Ping? Could someone be so kind as to answer my questions below? Thanks > I am interested in improving WebKits printing capabilities. Especially a way > to define headers and footers would be most welcome. The CSS3 Paged Media >

[webkit-dev] CSS3 Paged Media module

2012-02-08 Thread Milian Wolff
Hello! I am interested in improving WebKits printing capabilities. Especially a way to define headers and footers would be most welcome. The CSS3 Paged Media module [1] should allow just that. I wonder, has anyone begun working on this? If not, I am willing to give it a shot. I realize that th