On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Ojan Vafai wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 12:46 PM, Dirk Pranke wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
>> > On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Dirk Pranke
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I have no objection either to increasing the defaults for ei
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 12:46 PM, Dirk Pranke wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Dirk Pranke
> wrote:
> >>
> >> I have no objection either to increasing the defaults for either of
> >> these numbers or making it possible to have dif
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Dirk Pranke wrote:
>>
>> I have no objection either to increasing the defaults for either of
>> these numbers or making it possible to have different defaults per
>> port.
>>
>> Do you want to suggest differen
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Dirk Pranke wrote:
> I have no objection either to increasing the defaults for either of
> these numbers or making it possible to have different defaults per
> port.
>
> Do you want to suggest different defaults? Should we use ORWT's
> (infinite failures and infin
I have no objection either to increasing the defaults for either of
these numbers or making it possible to have different defaults per
port.
Do you want to suggest different defaults? Should we use ORWT's
(infinite failures and infinite crashes by default)?
-- Dirk
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 12:31 P
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Ojan Vafai wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 12:05 PM, Ojan Vafai wrote:
>>>
>>> We'll still default --exit-after-n-crashes-or-timeouts to 20. That seems
>>> more useful to me since you'd rarely hit this ca
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 12:05 PM, Ojan Vafai wrote:
>>
>> We'll still default --exit-after-n-crashes-or-timeouts to 20. That seems
>> more useful to me since you'd rarely hit this case locally and want to
>> continue running tests.
>>
>
> We
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 12:05 PM, Ojan Vafai wrote:
>
> We'll still default --exit-after-n-crashes-or-timeouts to 20. That seems
> more useful to me since you'd rarely hit this case locally and want to
> continue running tests.
>
We should also increase this number. Non-chromium bots hit this limi
Speaking of differences between NRWT and ORWT, ORWT doesn't limit to n
failures by default. NRWT limits to 500 by default. It looks like all the
bots pass in --exit-after-n-failures=500. Any objection to making NRWT
match ORWT here? I don't think having this limit is useful/necessary for
local deve
9 matches
Mail list logo
