Thanks for the follow up, Karen.
- R. Niwa
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 12:19 AM, Karen Shaeffer
wrote:
> Hi Ryosuke,
> I don't have time at the moment. But I remain interested in WebKit and am
> reading the
> emails as much as possible. I am thinking I'll have more time this summer
> for WebKit.
>
Hi Ryosuke,
I don't have time at the moment. But I remain interested in WebKit and am
reading the
emails as much as possible. I am thinking I'll have more time this summer for
WebKit.
Thanks for following up. I have given the issue considerable thought. Not
practical for
me at the moment.
enjo
Hi Karen,
Have you decided whether you can maintain the CSS variables in WebKit or
not? As far as I checked, I didn't find any patches posted or committed by
you on Bugzilla or on Trac.
We have a contributor's meeting coming up in Thursday, and I would like to
know whether we can proceed to remov
On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 7:30 PM, Karen Shaeffer wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 07, 2013 at 05:40:33PM -0700, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Jon Rimmer wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > As well as being in Chrome, custom property support is also being
> > > developed by Mozilla[4]. It is an act
On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 7:30 PM, Karen Shaeffer wrote:
>
> I am willing to consider if it is practical for me to volunteer to
> maintain CSS
> variables for the webkit project. I'll need a week to make an informed
> decision,
> because I already have a full plate. But I am very interested in webkit,
On Sun, Apr 07, 2013 at 05:40:33PM -0700, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Jon Rimmer wrote:
>
> >
> > As well as being in Chrome, custom property support is also being
> > developed by Mozilla[4]. It is an actively edited W3C spec that is expected
> > to reach Last Call stat
On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Jon Rimmer wrote:
> The debate over the syntax of "CSS variables" is long and storied, and is
> marked by misused terminology and misunderstanding in general. Most
> objections from developers stem from a preference for a $foo style syntax,
> as used in the SASS pr
On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Andreas Kling wrote:
> I'd like to remove the CSS variable feature from the tree now that
> Chromium has left, as they were the only ones shipping it AFAIK.
>
If we were to keep the feature, my only concern will be that someone needs
to maintain this code.
Is any
8 matches
Mail list logo
