On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 1:37 AM, Alois Reitbauer <
alois.reitba...@dynatrace.com> wrote:
> As discussed with Richard and Zhiheng here the feedback on the proposal by
> dynaTrace software. We had a look at the new spec draft and have a number of
> questions and proposals:
>
> -In the Navigatio
As discussed with Richard and Zhiheng here the feedback on the proposal
by dynaTrace software. We had a look at the new spec draft and have a
number of questions and proposals:
-In the NavigationTiming interface you refer to paint events. Do
you really mean paint here or layouting? Paint even
I¹d like to address the question by Darin, regarding the question of
feedback and whether anyone is planning to build something to use this new
feature...
I work for a company that sells a web performance monitoring service to
Fortune 1000 companies. To give a quick bit of background to the monito
Please see inline.
Thanks
Pavel
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 11:12 PM, Darin Adler wrote:
> Has there been any discussion of or feedback about the web timing proposal?
>
Not much of feedback yet.
> Would WebKit’s implementation of this be the first one?
>
Variation of this is supported in Chromium
Has there been any discussion of or feedback about the web timing
proposal?
Would WebKit’s implementation of this be the first one?
Is someone planning on building a benchmark that uses this new feature
to evaluate browser speed?
-- Darin
__
I've been asked to look at the WebTiming proposal wrt implementing it in
WebKit. Any objections / suggestions or hints? Please find proposal brief
below.
Pavel
<< Pasting proposal brief below >>
User latency is an important quality benchmark for Web Applications. While
JavaScript-based mechanism
6 matches
Mail list logo
