Hi Ryosuke,
looking closer at RTE2-AC_JF_TEXT-1_SC it seems to actually pass on my
Chrome Mac build (but it doesn't generate a )?!):
Result: foo^bar
Chromium7.0.547.0 (Developer Build ) WebKit534.10 V82.4.8
did you make any changes, or are you looking at a different build?
Cheers,
- Roland
O
I don't have a ToT WebKit browser ATM, but I'll check once I updated and
compiled.
FWIW, this seems to be a regression anyways, since release Chromium (Chrome
6.0) at least passes all those tests, without extra (?)
Cheers,
- Roland
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 5:07 AM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
> Howev
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 5:14 AM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
> I also noticed:
>
> RTE2-CC_FN:a_FONTf:a-1_SI fontname 'courier' y y y y FAIL face="arial">foo[bar]baz foo[bar]baz face="arial">foo[bar]baz Change existing font
> name to same font name, using CSS styling (should be noop)
>
> Isn't supposed
Yay! http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/68904 fixed the last failing tests in
queryCommandState & queryCommandIndeterminate. Now we pass all the sub
tests.
- Ryosuke
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 2:04 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
> I think we shouldn't be hard-coding 18px here:
>
> {'value': '18px', 'pad':
I think we shouldn't be hard-coding 18px here:
{'value': '18px', 'pad': '[foobarbaz]', 'expected': ['[foobarbaz]', '[foobarbaz]'], 'command': 'fontsize', 'id':
'FS:18px_SPANs:fs:l-1_SW', 'desc': 'Change existing font size to equivalent
px size (should be noop, or change unit)'}
The pixel font val
I also noticed:
RTE2-CC_FN:a_FONTf:a-1_SI fontname 'courier' y y y y FAIL foo[bar]baz foo[bar]baz foo[bar]baz Change existing font name
to same font name, using CSS styling (should be noop)
Isn't supposed to be fontname 'arial' instead? There are 4 other tests
below this one with the seemingly t
However, we pass JustifyLeft, JustifyRight, JustifyCenter even though we
also add BR in those cases. I don't quite understand the difference
there...
- Ryosuke
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 6:58 PM, Roland Steiner wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
>
>> Mn... I realized so
First Blood!
^_- Roland
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
> But thanks to your test suite, I noticed some very embarrassing fact:
> https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46954
>
> - Ryosuke
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 6:58 PM, Roland Steiner
> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Oct 1,
But thanks to your test suite, I noticed some very embarrassing fact:
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46954
- Ryosuke
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 6:58 PM, Roland Steiner wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
>
>> Mn... I realized something strange here.
>>
>> RTE2-AC
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
> Mn... I realized something strange here.
>
> RTE2-AC_JF_TEXT-1_SC fails on WebKit TOT and the test is: JustifyFull on
> "foo^bar". However, it clearly works on WebKit when I test it manually. It
> generates foobar. I'm not sure
> why the t
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
> Great. I'm getting get 500 on the results page but is this because it's
> still beta?
>
Good question - shouldn't happen. Have to ping Lindsey to see what the
problem is... :(
Cheers,
- Roland
_
Mn... I realized something strange here.
RTE2-AC_JF_TEXT-1_SC fails on WebKit TOT and the test is: JustifyFull on
"foo^bar". However, it clearly works on WebKit when I test it manually. It
generates foobar. I'm not sure
why the test claims that WebKit fails on this particular test.
Best,
Ryosu
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 2:30 AM, Roland Steiner
wrote:
>
> As a lot of folks here can probably attest to (Hi, Ryosuke! ;) ), the
> current state of rich text editing amongst various browsers is not ideal.
> WebKit is better than most, but still not perfect, either.
>
Hi, Roland!
In order to docum
[Apologies if you have seen this already!]
Hi all,
As a lot of folks here can probably attest to (Hi, Ryosuke! ;) ), the
current state of rich text editing amongst various browsers is not ideal.
WebKit is better than most, but still not perfect, either.
In order to document this and provide a g
14 matches
Mail list logo